DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif

45.6 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
7
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Report excerpt / legal document
File Size: 45.6 KB
Summary

This document details discussions and drafts surrounding a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein, focusing on victim compensation and the requirement for Epstein to register as a sex offender. It mentions key individuals like Acosta, Menchel, and Villafaña, and highlights changes made to Villafaña's initial draft before presentation to defense counsel. The text also references relevant legal statutes concerning civil remedies for victims of certain crimes and a memorandum from Acting Deputy Attorney General Craig S. Morford.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Acosta Individual involved in non-prosecution agreement
Proposed the 'non-prosecution agreement' terminology; told OPR he developed and approved the term sheet.
Menchel Individual involved in discussions
May have communicated terminology to Villafaña; sent July 3, 2007 email to Villafaña mentioning sex offender status i...
Villafaña Individual involved in drafting agreement
Asked for monetary compensation for victims; drafted terms for the agreement, including Epstein registering as a sexu...
Epstein Subject of the agreement
Would have pleaded guilty to federal charges; required to plead guilty to an offense requiring sex offender registrat...
Craig S. Morford Acting Deputy Attorney General
Author of a memorandum to Departmental Components and US Attorneys.
Sanchez Individual in discussions
Discussed preliminary terms with Menchel.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
OPR
Office of Professional Responsibility or similar oversight body; Acosta and Villafaña communicated with OPR.
United States Attorneys
Recipients of memorandum from Craig S. Morford.
United States District Court
Where victims of certain crimes may sue for damages.

Timeline (3 events)

Drafting of a non-prosecution agreement term sheet by Villafaña, including provisions for victim compensation and Epstein's sex offender registration.
Acosta's approval and development of the term sheet.
Presentation of the document to defense counsel, with two terms dropped from Villafaña's draft: one limiting the agreement to already-identified victims and another requiring Epstein to plead guilty within the month.
Villafaña Epstein defense counsel

Relationships (7)

Acosta communicated with Menchel
Menchel may have communicated terminology to Acosta.
Acosta communicated with OPR
Acosta told OPR that he 'developed and approved' the term sheet.
Villafaña received terminology from Acosta
Terminology for 'non-prosecution agreement' came from Acosta, communicated potentially by Menchel to Villafaña.
Villafaña involved in agreement concerning Epstein
Villafaña drafted terms for Epstein's agreement, including plea and sex offender registration.
Menchel communicated with Villafaña
Menchel's July 3, 2007 email to Villafaña.
Menchel discussed with Sanchez
Menchel's preliminary discussions with Sanchez.
Villafaña communicated with OPR
Villafaña also told OPR that she asked that the terms include the requirement that Epstein plead to an offense that required him to register as a sexual offender.

Key Quotes (4)

"as a "non-prosecution agreement" came from Acosta, although Menchel may have communicated that terminology to her."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
Quote #1
"According to Villafaña, she asked that it include a mechanism for the victims to be provided monetary compensation through 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in lieu of the restitution that would have been available if Epstein were pleading guilty to federal charges."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
Quote #2
"Acosta told OPR that he "developed and approved" the term sheet.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
Quote #3
"Before the document was presented to defense counsel, two terms were dropped from Villafaña's draft-one providing that the agreement would apply only to already-identified victims, and another requiring the deal to be accepted, and Epstein to plead guilty, within the month."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,352 characters)

as a "non-prosecution agreement" came from Acosta, although Menchel may have communicated that terminology to her. According to Villafaña, she asked that it include a mechanism for the victims to be provided monetary compensation through 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in lieu of the restitution that would have been available if Epstein were pleading guilty to federal charges. 86 Acosta told OPR that he "developed and approved" the term sheet." Before the document was presented to defense counsel, two terms were dropped from Villafaña's draft-one providing that the agreement would apply only to already-identified victims, and another requiring the deal to be accepted, and Epstein to plead guilty, within the month. The final term sheet was as follows: to plea agreements, which involve the formal conviction of a corporation in a court proceeding. Memorandum from Acting Deputy Attorney General Craig S. Morford to Heads of Departmental Components and United States Attorneys at n.2 (Mar. 7, 2008), available at https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource- manual-163-selection-and-use-monitors. Villafaña did not have significant experience prosecuting corporate entities. 86 A civil remedy for personal injuries suffered by victims of certain crimes is provided for in the federal criminal code at 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Subsection (a) of the statute, as in effect from July 27, 2006, to March 6, 2013, provided as follows: Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than $150,000 in value. Villafaña also told OPR that she asked that the terms include the requirement that Epstein plead to an offense that required him to register as a sexual offender; however, sex offender status was also mentioned in Menchel's July 3, 2007 email to Villafaña recounting his preliminary discussions with Sanchez. 52 DOJ-OGR-00023090

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document