| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | OPR initiated an investigation into allegations that prosecutors in the USAO improperly resolved ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses, including FBI agents, USAO staff, and Departm... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Investigation | OPR investigated allegations that USAO prosecutors improperly resolved a federal investigation in... | Southern District of Florida | View |
This document is a chain of emails from May 2019 between the FBI and SDNY regarding the transfer of Jeffrey Epstein's case files from the FBI's West Palm Beach office to New York. SDNY officials express frustration with the six-month delay (having requested the files in December 2018) and pressure from their supervisors to begin scanning the documents using a third-party vendor. The chain discusses logistics, the involvement of the ASAC and SSA, and cites precedents for using outside vendors for sensitive case files.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from August 2020. It details the distribution of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. The Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their team are coordinating a review of this draft to identify any sensitive information that might impact ongoing investigations.
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, sent by an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email circulates excerpts from the 'Epstein OPR report' detailing the Office of Professional Responsibility's framework for analyzing attorney misconduct, as well as sections from the Justice Manual regarding the authority and procedures of the Professional Misconduct Review Unit (PMRU).
This document is an email dated February 12, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to an individual in the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The AUSA identifies themselves as working on the current investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and requests a meeting or call for deconfliction purposes regarding their respective matters.
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at SDNY contacts OPR Counsel to discuss the 'universe of materials' OPR gathered during their review of the 2008 Non-prosecution Agreement between the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein. SDNY seeks this information to determine their discovery obligations in the recently filed case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email thread from February 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS/SDNY) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) at the Department of Justice. The correspondence coordinates points of contact (POCs) for the Epstein case, specifically identifying an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) at SDNY as the contact person and introducing the primary attorneys handling the OPR matter. The names of the officials involved are redacted.
This document is a redacted email chain ending on January 29, 2021, forwarding the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) final report regarding the Jeffrey Epstein matter. The original email from November 12, 2020, includes attachments of the report and a signed transmittal letter addressed to the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
This document is an email chain dated August 14, 2020, involving the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY and other redacted staff members. The emails coordinate a time for a conference call regarding 'OPR' and other issues. One email explicitly mentions a conflict due to a witness interview for 'Prutech' and a 5:00 PM call to 'discuss the priv [privilege] review for the Epstein devices.'
This document is an email chain between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and officials at the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The correspondence, spanning from February to July 2019, involves the AUSA initiating contact to discuss 'deconfliction' regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The chain shows coordination efforts, scheduling of calls involving cocounsel Steve Fenn, and mentions the AUSA's involvement in Grand Jury proceedings in February 2019.
This document is an email chain forwarding the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) final report regarding the Jeffrey Epstein matter. The original email was sent on November 12, 2020, and subsequently forwarded on January 29, 2021. The email includes attachments of the report and a transmittal letter to the SDNY.
This document is a chain of internal emails from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated between July 31 and August 10, 2020. The correspondence focuses on preparing for discovery deadlines and potential arrests/indictments, specifically reviewing old files from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The emails detail a search for evidence regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's status in the original Florida case, citing Grand Jury testimony where an agent described Maxwell meeting 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago.
Internal USANYS email chain from October 2020 discussing discovery obligations regarding an original FBI agent from the Florida Epstein investigation. The prosecutors decided not to collect certain emails between the agent and an AUSA because they believed OPR had already collected them, but the agent agreed to send emails received from victims or witnesses.
Internal USANYS email chain from October 2020 discussing discovery obligations in the Epstein case. Attorneys discuss a conversation with an original FBI agent from the Florida investigation who possesses emails exchanged with a former AUSA and communications from victims/witnesses. The team concludes they likely do not need to collect the AUSA emails as they were already covered by an OPR collection, but the agent will send victim/witness emails and other potential discovery material.
This is a statistical 'Search Terms Report' generated on January 13, 2021, for the case 'US v Epstein'. It analyzes a dataset labeled 'OPR Materials' containing 300,123 documents. The report indicates that search terms (which are redacted in this document) yielded 19,512 direct hits, or 32,986 hits when including document families. The document provides a breakdown of hit counts for each specific redacted search term.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 discussing logistics for a meeting regarding the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Final Report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. The chain originates from a November 12, 2020 email that originally distributed the final report and a transmittal letter to the SDNY. The participants are redacted, but the context involves government or legal officials coordinating a discussion about the findings.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 discussing the scheduling of a call regarding the 'OPR Epstein Final Report.' The chain references an original email from November 12, 2020, which contained the actual OPR final report and a transmittal letter to the SDNY as attachments. The participants are redacted but appear to be government officials coordinating a discussion about the investigation findings.
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated July-August 2020. They are discussing the extent of Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement and mention in the original Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation, specifically reviewing grand jury testimony and search warrants. The text quotes an agent's testimony stating Maxwell met 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago and introduced her to Epstein, after which she began providing massages.
This document is an email chain from November 2020 forwarding the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) final report regarding the Jeffrey Epstein matter. The email was originally sent on November 12, 2020, to Audrey Strauss at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), containing two PDF attachments related to the investigation and exhibits.
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at USANYS reached out to the Associate Deputy Attorney General to discuss document and discovery requests related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically in light of the recent charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The ODAG official advised contacting SDFL directly as CVRA litigation had concluded and noted that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
This document is a Public Corruption Unit status update from November 6, 2020, regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her indictment, arrest in New Hampshire, and detention conditions, while noting ongoing discovery work and collaboration with USAO-SDFL and West Palm Beach Police. The report highlights significant investigative steps, including the pursuit of an interview with Prince Andrew via MLAT after he declined a voluntary interview, and discussions regarding a felony disposition for a redacted individual.
This FBI Import Form, dated November 24, 2020, documents the Victim Services Division's support efforts regarding an ODAG briefing on OPR findings related to the Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking case. The document mentions a specific briefing on November 11, 2020, and encloses updated contact information as of November 18, 2020, likely relating to victims involved in the OPR review process.
This document contains an email chain between the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from July 2020. The correspondence details the volume of evidence collected by OPR during its investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically citing approximately 516,000 emails obtained from 5 subjects and roughly 19,000 pages of scanned hard copy documents. The USANYS is requesting copies of these materials for use in ongoing litigation, prompting OPR to request a discussion regarding the legal implications of sharing internal investigation records.
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2020, involving USANYS officials discussing a budget shortfall ('out of money through the end of the fiscal'). The staff is seeking approval for approximately $10,000 to hire a vendor immediately to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff,' rather than waiting until the new fiscal year in October. One email notes that while money is tight, 'Maxwell is on his radar' (referring to a superior), suggesting exceptions might be made for high-priority cases.
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from September 10, 2020, between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The discussion concerns a budget shortage ('out of money through the end of the fiscal') preventing the immediate hiring of a vendor to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff'. Despite the shortage, one participant confirms that an unidentified male superior 'will find the 10K for Maxwell' to ensure the work proceeds without waiting until October.
This document is an email dated July 27, 2020, from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the Chief of Public Corruption at USAO-SDNY. It provides statistical data regarding an OPR investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, noting that approximately 516,000 email files were obtained from 5 subjects, with about 3,000 deemed directly relevant. The email also details document counts related to the CVRA litigation, distinguishing between pages produced to petitioners and privileged documents submitted to the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity