Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (stipulation of dismissal)
File Size: 61.7 KB
Summary

This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed on December 7, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-CV-80591. The plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 101, and defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, agreed to dismiss the lawsuit following a settlement, the terms of which the court retains jurisdiction to enforce. The document is signed by Robert Critton (representing Epstein) and Katherine W. Ezell (representing Jane Doe No. 101).

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe No. 101 Plaintiff
Party dismissing the lawsuit against Epstein following a settlement.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Defendant in the lawsuit being dismissed.
Robert Critton Attorney
Attorney representing Jeffrey Epstein from Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP.
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney
Attorney representing Jane Doe No. 101 from Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Venue where the case was filed.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP
Legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
Legal counsel for Jane Doe No. 101.

Timeline (2 events)

2009-12-07
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed
Southern District of Florida
2009-12-07
Settlement Agreement
N/A

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of Epstein's legal counsel.
Address of Plaintiff's legal counsel.

Relationships (3)

Jane Doe No. 101 Legal Adversaries Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff and Defendant in Case No. 09-CV-80591
Robert Critton Attorney-Client Jeffrey Epstein
Listed as Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney-Client Jane Doe No. 101
Listed as Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 101

Key Quotes (2)

"hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice."
Source
089.pdf
Quote #1
"The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement."
Source
089.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,279 characters)

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2009 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 101,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_________________________/
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 101 and Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN (collectively, "Parties"),
by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. The Parties further
stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement.
Dated this 7th day of December, 2009.
Respectfully submitted,
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER
& COLEMAN LLP
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
By: [Signature]
Robert Critton
Fla. Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Telephone: (561) 842-2820
Facsimile: (561) 515-3148
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 101
By: [Signature]
Katherine W. Ezell
Katherine W. Ezell
Fla. Bar No. 114771
kezell@podhurst.com
City National Bank Building
25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
Telephone: (305) 358-2800
Facsimile: (305) 358-2382

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document