This document is a page from a legal summation in a court case, filed on August 10, 2022. The speaker argues that memory is a constructive and fallible process, using Annie Farmer's incorrect recollection of an April 1996 date as an example. The speaker also defends the credibility of an expert, Dr. Loftus, by stating she has consulted for the Department of Justice, FBI, and Secret Service, countering the implication that she is solely a defense witness.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of the summation: "Summation - Ms. Menninger".
|
|
| Annie Farmer |
Used as an example of someone whose memory of an April 1996 date was incorrect, illustrating the constructive process...
|
|
| Dr. Loftus | Expert / Witness |
An expert who has consulted with various government agencies and is being presented as more than just a defense witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice | Government agency |
Mentioned as an agency that Dr. Loftus has consulted with.
|
| FBI | Government agency |
Mentioned as an agency that Dr. Loftus has consulted with.
|
| Secret Service | Government agency |
Mentioned as an agency that Dr. Loftus has consulted with.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting firm that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a question about sexual abuse: "Are you sure there was no sexual abuse in New Mexico?"
|
"And she explained to you that memory is a constructive process; that we often takes bits and pieces of experiences and try to put them together to make sense, which is exactly what Annie Farmer told you she did when she figured out the April 1996 date and she happened to be wrong."Source
"Dr. Loftus has consulted with the Department of Justice, the bosses of these prosecutors; the FBI, the people who interviewed in this case; and the Secret Service. So to be telling you that she's only a defense witness is simply not true."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,624 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document