DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg
451 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
451 KB
Summary
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government informs the court that, after conferring with the defense, they will not agree to a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert Glassman. The Government argues that a specific statement in an email is inadmissible and requires context to be understood by the jury.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter; United States District Court Judge.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Robert Glassman | Witness / Subject of Testimony |
The letter discusses a potential stipulation regarding his testimony and references a letter written by him on 12/6/21.
|
| The Government | Prosecution / Sender |
The entity submitting the letter (U.S. Attorney's Office).
|
| Defense Counsel | Legal Defense |
Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, with whom the Government conferred.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice |
Header organization
|
|
| United States Attorney Southern District of New York |
Prosecuting office sending the letter
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court hearing the case
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Office of the US Attorney (Sender)
|
|
|
Court address (Recipient)
|
Relationships (2)
Conferring regarding stipulation on testimony.
Stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert Glassman in US v. Maxwell.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Government respectfully submits this letter regarding the question whether the pending privilege issue could be resolved by a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert Glassman."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg
Quote #1
"the Government remains of the view that the statement in the email is not admissible and requires additional context for it to be understandable by the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg
Quote #2
"Accordingly, the Government would not enter into such a stipulation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,074 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 541 Filed 12/13/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
December 13, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter regarding the question whether the
pending privilege issue could be resolved by a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert
Glassman. After considering the issue and conferring with defense counsel, the Government
remains of the view that the statement in the email is not admissible and requires additional context
for it to be understandable by the jury. (See Gov’t Letter at 7-8, Dkt. No. 528; 12/6/21 Letter from
Robert Glassman at 3-4). Accordingly, the Government would not enter into such a stipulation.
pending privilege issue could be resolved by a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert
Glassman. After considering the issue and conferring with defense counsel, the Government
remains of the view that the statement in the email is not admissible and requires additional context
for it to be understandable by the jury. (See Gov’t Letter at 7-8, Dkt. No. 528; 12/6/21 Letter from
Robert Glassman at 3-4). Accordingly, the Government would not enter into such a stipulation.
1
DOJ-OGR-00008361
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document