Robert Glassman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Rossmiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant vs counsel for victims |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Witness case subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Claimant]
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Nathan Werksman
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED victim]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane's Husband's Best Friend
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nathan Werksman
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Keilah Betts
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal request and opposition | The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, made a request to call Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert G... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-03 | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's side submitted a letter regarding Attorney Glassman's testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | N/A | Discussion between sender and Robert Glassman | N/A | View |
| 2021-08-17 | N/A | Phone call between Robert Glassman and a prosecutor regarding witness 'Jane'. | Unknown (Phone) | View |
| 2020-11-30 | N/A | Execution and notarization of General Release | Los Angeles, California | View |
| 2020-08-04 | N/A | USANYS provided document production and response letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein information. | View | |
| 2020-06-08 | N/A | Submission of Touhy Request letter regarding Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-08 | N/A | Robert Glassman submitted a Touhy Request for tangible and documentary evidence. | Email/Fedex | View |
| 2019-12-16 | N/A | Meeting scheduling discussion for SDNY investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-13 | N/A | Discussion regarding meeting time for Monday (11:00 AM confirmed) and additional info. | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-13 | N/A | Discussion about client's mother's location (overseas) for potential interview planning. | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-11 | N/A | Confirmation of meeting for Monday at 11:00 AM. Discussion topics for SDNY investigation includin... | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Robert Glassman confirms availability for a call on his cell today. | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Call scheduled in 5-10 minutes to discuss SDNY investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-04 | N/A | Initial follow-up call proposed for SDNY investigation, to check status and convey an additional ... | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-22 | N/A | Discussion about preferred communication method (cell phone) for SDNY investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Jane hired Robert Glassman | Unknown | View |
064-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands regarding the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell on June 2, 2020, grants the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program' and authorizes the Co-Executors to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020. It references a prior hearing on February 4, 2020, and notes that the USVI Attorney General agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
2021.12.07%20Notice%20of%20Entry%20of%20Judgment.pdf
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on December 7, 2021. It pertains to three consolidated cases involving the Government of the USVI, the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (with Darren K. Indyke as executor), and Ghislaine Maxwell (seeking indemnification). The notice lists numerous recipients, including judges and attorneys involved in the proceedings.
050.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman in the SDNY, dated June 3, 2020, informing the court that the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands has officially authorized the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Attached is the official Order from the USVI court (signed by Judge Hermon-Percell) granting the motion to establish the program and authorizing its commencement on June 15, 2020. The document notes that the USVI Attorney General has agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
030.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman updating the court on the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It attaches a Status Report filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and the detailed Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which outlines eligibility, claims administration, evaluation methodology, and compensation procedures for sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
059.pdf
This document is a legal filing from June 3, 2020, submitted by Troutman Sanders LLP to the SDNY Court. It informs Judge Freeman that the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands has officially granted the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.' The attached exhibit is the Order from the USVI court, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell, authorizing the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020, following an agreement with the USVI Attorney General to lift liens to fund the program.
EFTA00030454.pdf
An email dated May 29, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle to a redacted recipient. The email shares a link to an ABC News article regarding the difficulty an alleged victim is facing in locating Ghislaine Maxwell to serve a legal complaint.
EFTA00024529.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 20, 2020, between attorney Robert Glassman and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are verifying the timeline of a victim's 'first trip to New York' by cross-referencing her memory of seeing 'The Lion King' with flight records. The AUSA notes a discrepancy between the musical's 1997 release and the movie's 1994 release, which conflicts with the believed date of the first trip. Glassman clarifies that the victim specifically remembers a Broadway play where Epstein bragged about getting tickets from a famous friend. Glassman also makes a disparaging remark about Ghislaine Maxwell suing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
EFTA00020088.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 regarding a 'Touhy Request' for evidence in the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' in the SDNY. Attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP submits the request, and internal recipients (likely government officials given the nature of a Touhy request) discuss fulfilling it, noting it is similar to a request from 'Kaplan' and does not interfere with ongoing proceedings, with the exception of 'Item 8'.
EFTA00019467.pdf
An email dated June 8, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP regarding a 'Touhy Request' for tangible and documentary evidence in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. (SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF document, noting that a physical copy will also be sent via FedEx. The recipient's name and contact information are redacted.
EFTA00016896.pdf
This document is an email chain from late 2019 concerning an SDNY investigation, involving Robert Glassman and Nathan Werksman. The correspondence focuses on scheduling meetings, discussing logistical details like a client's mother's overseas location, and outlining topics for discussion related to potential contact with Epstein and/or Maxwell. The emails show an ongoing effort to coordinate in-person meetings in California and establish communication methods for the investigation.
EFTA00016286.pdf
This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00016264.pdf
An email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Robert Glassman regarding a 'Rule 412 motion' (likely related to the admissibility of evidence concerning a victim's sexual history). The email notes the motion was filed under seal, a response is due the following Monday, and a potential closed (in camera) hearing is scheduled for November 5, 2021.
EFTA00014452.pdf
A letter from the U.S. DOJ (SDNY) to attorney Robert Glassman regarding a request for information in the case Jane Doe v. Indyke. The DOJ authorizes the release of FedEx invoices, electronic search warrant documents, and a photograph of Glassman's client found during a physical search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence, while declining to provide grand jury materials.
EFTA00014450.pdf
This document is an email chain from June to August 2020 between attorney Robert Glassman (Panish Shea & Boyle LLP) and a representative of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy Request' for evidence related to the case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' On August 4, 2020, the USANYS representative responded with attachments explicitly named as relating to information about Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017807.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane,' discusses a past phone conversation with a reporter where she was careful not to reveal her name. She also testifies about how she hired her attorney, Robert Glassman, noting that he was a friend of her husband's best friend.
DOJ-OGR-00008383.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 15, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is requesting permission to redact portions of the defendant's motion seeking testimony from Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman to protect the privacy of a Minor Victim.
DOJ-OGR-00008381.jpg
This legal document presents an argument to the Court to preclude the testimony of Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman. The core argument is that Glassman's settlement negotiations with an entity called EVCP cannot be used to impeach a witness named Jane, because she testified she was unaware of these negotiations. Allowing this testimony would be improper impeachment and more prejudicial than probative.
DOJ-OGR-00008380.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, discusses the defendant's attempt to introduce statements from Robert Glassman to impeach a witness named Jane. The document details Jane's evolving testimony about a trip to New York with Epstein and the defendant to see 'The Lion King,' noting that her corrected recollections were communicated to the Government by her lawyer. The prosecution argues that Glassman's testimony on these same points is unnecessary and that questions about Jane's conversations with him were met with sustained objections.
DOJ-OGR-00008376.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Document 545) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 15, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's motion to call three attorneys for victims (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) as witnesses, stating such testimony would be irrelevant, duplicative, or improper impeachment. Specifically regarding Jack Scarola, the document notes he represented victim 'Carolyn' in a 2008 lawsuit and before the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, facts which Carolyn already admitted during cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00008374.jpg
This legal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 14, 2021, opposes defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call three attorneys for victims (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) to testify. The Government argues that their testimony about privileged client conversations or discussions with the Government would be irrelevant and an improper attempt to circumvent privilege, as the victims themselves have already testified.
DOJ-OGR-00008370.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, argues that testimony from attorney Robert Glassman is not protected by attorney-client privilege. It focuses on a discrepancy in a witness's ('Jane') memory, where she claimed Mr. Epstein took her to see 'The Lion King' on Broadway in 1994, three years before it premiered. The document details communications between AUSA Rossmiller and Mr. Glassman where the government pointed out the error, but Jane insisted her story was correct.
DOJ-OGR-00008364.jpg
A letter dated December 13, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court of the defense's intention to question attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman and argues that these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege. The document cites legal precedents regarding the burden of proof for privilege claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government informs the court that, after conferring with the defense, they will not agree to a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert Glassman. The Government argues that a specific statement in an email is inadmissible and requires context to be understood by the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
Legal Advice
Advised that cooperating would help her civil case.
Legal advice regarding cooperation
Discussions regarding whether to cooperate with the case.
Legal advice/cooperation
Alleged statement that cooperating would 'help her case'.
N/A
Referenced in text as '12/6/21 Letter from Robert Glassman at 3-4'
Rule 412
Attaching a copy of the Rule 412 motion filed under seal. Mentions a response will be filed Monday and a potential in camera hearing on Nov 5, 2021.
Jane's cooperation
Glassman discussed Jane's cooperation, stating he advised her it was the morally right thing to do and would 'help her case'.
bail application
Notification that Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys intend to file a new bail application. The AUSA notes it hasn't been filed yet and offers to keep Glassman updated.
Re: bail application
Thanks for the update
Plaintiff's Opposition Letter to Defendant Ghislaine Maxw...
Argument opposing the stay of civil proceedings requested by Maxwell.
RE: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy ...
Providing attached letter responding to Touhy request and document production.
Request for Information Relating to Jeffrey Epstein
Response authorizing release of certain documents under Touhy regulations.
Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy ...
Thanking for checking in and hoping to follow up soon.
Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy ...
Following up on client's request, asking for expedient compliance.
Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Requ...
Submission of a Touhy Request letter with attachment.
Re: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy ...
Acknowledging receipt of letter and promising to follow up.
Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Requ...
Initial request sending attached letter via email and Fedex.
Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Requ...
Cover email for an attached Touhy Request letter regarding the Jane Doe v. Indyke case.
Request for Information Relating to Jeffrey Epstein
Request seeking documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and plaintiff Jane Doe.
Re: RE: [Redacted] follow-up
Relaying client's response about 'The Lion King': Epstein bragged about knowing [Redacted] who gave them first row mezzanine seats.
RE: RE: [Redacted] follow-up
Confirmation that the trip discussed wouldn't have been the 'first trip' based on flight records and timeline.
RE: RE: [Redacted] follow-up
Comment about Maxwell suing during a pandemic.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up
Inquiry about the timeline discrepancy regarding 'The Lion King' (Musical 1997 vs Movie 1994) relative to the witness's first trip to New York.
Re: SDNY investigation
Checking with the team about scheduling, cell is best way to reach. Thanks.
No Subject
What's your cell again?
Re: SDNY investigation
Cannot do earlier than 11. She needs time for kid stuff. Mother is overseas, not in the US; will find out more and chat Monday.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity