DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg

481 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 481 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning attorney establishes that the witness does not know the physical location of a desktop computer at the time certain exhibits were created, suggesting it could have been in Florida, New York, or elsewhere. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes two objections during this line of questioning, both of which are overruled by the court.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Flatley Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
Makes two objections during the cross-examination, both of which are overruled.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the proceedings and ruling on objections.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the location of a desktop computer used to create exhibits for the case.
Courtroom (implied)
Flatley MS. POMERANTZ THE COURT Unidentified Questioning Attorney

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned as a possible location for a desktop computer.
Mentioned as a possible location for a desktop computer.

Relationships (2)

Questioning Attorney (Q) professional Flatley
The document shows an attorney cross-examining a witness, Flatley, in a court proceeding.
MS. POMERANTZ professional THE COURT
Ms. Pomerantz, an attorney, addresses the court with objections, and the court rules on them.

Key Quotes (3)

"Objection, your Honor."
Source
— MS. POMERANTZ (An objection made during the cross-examination of the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg
Quote #1
"Overruled."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's ruling on an objection made by Ms. Pomerantz.)
DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg
Quote #2
"So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or somewhere else; right?"
Source
— Questioning Attorney (Q) (A question posed to the witness to establish that the location of a desktop computer is unknown.)
DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,155 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 264 1501
LC7Cmax2
Flatley - cross
1 course of that copying; correct?
2 A. That is correct.
3 Q. You just don't have something to compare it to; right?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. If you had the other one, you could run the same program;
6 right?
7 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Overruled.
9 Q. If you had the other one, you could run the same program
10 and make sure that they were identical; right?
11 A. That's correct.
12 Q. So, because you don't have that other thing to compare it
13 to - what you think is a desktop; right?
14 A. Correct.
15 Q. - you don't know where that desktop was living when any of
16 these exhibits were created; correct?
17 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: Overruled.
19 A. No, I don't.
20 Q. Right. You don't have a location, a geo location for any
21 of these particular documents you've been testifying about;
22 correct?
23 A. That's correct.
24 Q. So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or
25 somewhere else; right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018673

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document