This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning attorney establishes that the witness does not know the physical location of a desktop computer at the time certain exhibits were created, suggesting it could have been in Florida, New York, or elsewhere. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes two objections during this line of questioning, both of which are overruled by the court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Flatley | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Makes two objections during the cross-examination, both of which are overruled.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings and ruling on objections.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Objection, your Honor."Source
"Overruled."Source
"So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or somewhere else; right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,155 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document