Flatley
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q.)
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Questioning Attorney (Q)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Direct examination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Stella McCartney
|
Coordinator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Female Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Cross examiner witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Evidence (Hard Drives)
|
Chain of custody |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Witness Flatley received a box containing three hard drives with broken evidence tape. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of a hard drive by witness Flatley. | Lab/Office | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding metadata in Word documents, specifically Government E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the location of a desktop computer used to create ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Flatley by an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz regarding Govern... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Flatley. Government Exhibit 418B was admitted into evidence, and Go... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of a witness named Flatley regarding the creation of a digital image from a clone. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding access to a computer with a user account for Ghisl... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding digital files (Government Exhibits 418, 420, 421,... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the technical details of how author information is... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named Flatley regarding the analysis of a hard drive. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Flatley in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Recross-examination of witness Mr. Flatley concludes, and the court announces a mid-morning break. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibits 54 and 419. Mr. Flatley i... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibit 422, a do... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic review | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification/Presentation of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of recross-examination of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing date for the transcript of the trial proceedings in US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 into evidence during the trial. | Courtroom (SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding the authentication of digital evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic analysis of a computer hard drive, specif... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court transcript document. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00032141.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI (NY Field Office/CART) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the chaotic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The US Attorney's office complains that over 1.3 million documents were provided in a disorganized manner, with emails unlinked from attachments (specifically citing flight records as an example of unlinked data), making review impossible. The FBI cites technical issues, including a network replacement where they were mandated to delete 400TB of old data, and clarifies that some evidence originated from a July 2007 search.
EFTA00029600.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).
EFTA00016508.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding legal proceedings. Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. sends a supplemental letter to USANYS counsel regarding the anticipated testimony of a redacted individual (Mr. [Redacted]). The forwarding email references 'Flatley and their rebuttal expert,' suggesting the correspondence concerns expert witness testimony or rebuttal.
EFTA00008519.pdf
This document is a photograph of FBI evidence collected on August 13, 2019, from Little Saint James in relation to case 31E-NY-3027571. The evidence displayed includes multiple computer hard drives (Seagate Barracuda), a CD/DVD, and envelopes, with labels referencing 'Epstein Server', a 'Flatley Case DVR', and a Silver iPad Model A1567. A CD is labeled 'Epstein Priv Term' dated 7/25/2019, likely referring to a privilege review team or private terminal data.
DOJ-OGR-00018120.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An attorney, Ms. Comey, informs the judge that the witness order for the day has been changed due to travel issues, with the new sequence being Parkinson, Dawson, Maguire, Meder, and Flatley. The parties also discuss that witness Shelling's testimony has been stipulated to and that witness Maguire will likely testify after lunch.
DOJ-OGR-00018681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The court excuses a witness, Mr. Flatley, after his recross-examination. After a brief exchange with government counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, the court announces a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018680.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley, who confirms that an internet-connected computer could automatically populate emails. After attorney Ms. Pomerantz concludes her questions, the judge excuses Mr. Flatley and announces a 15-minute mid-morning break for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018678.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a specific computer, establishing that Ghislaine Maxwell held the only non-default user account on the device. The defense attorney attempts to establish doubt about who physically accessed the computer, suggesting it could have been in a common area (like a kitchen) and used by others via Maxwell's logged-in account.
DOJ-OGR-00018677.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on the creation of a document, attempting to cast doubt on whether a person named 'gmax' could have created it by highlighting that her physical location on January 29, 2002, might differ from the computer's location. The witness, Flatley, admits to not knowing who created the document or where the computer was located.
DOJ-OGR-00018676.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on technical forensic details, specifically regarding computer clones, passwords, metadata, and the creation date of a specific Word document (Government Exhibit 418) which was established as January 29, 2002. The witness confirms they did not verify the physical location of any person on that specific date based on the metadata.
DOJ-OGR-00018675.jpg
This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a forensic expert named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony focuses on technical details of how computer file dates are auto-populated by the system clock and how forensic examiners access data via cloned images and forensic software to bypass operating system password protections.
DOJ-OGR-00018674.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on clarifying the meaning of the 'author' metadata in a Microsoft Word file. Flatley explains that the author name (e.g., 'gmax') is a user-defined field linked to the account that set up the software (e.g., 'Ghislaine') and does not definitively prove who was physically using the computer to create a specific document.
DOJ-OGR-00018673.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning attorney establishes that the witness does not know the physical location of a desktop computer at the time certain exhibits were created, suggesting it could have been in Florida, New York, or elsewhere. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes two objections during this line of questioning, both of which are overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018672.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on Flatley's process of creating a digital 'image' from a 'clone,' establishing that while the image was a perfect copy of the clone, Flatley had no knowledge of the clone's origin or whether it was an unaltered copy of an original source.
DOJ-OGR-00018671.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on the forensic examination of a hard drive, confirming it originated from a desktop computer rather than a laptop, and establishing that the drive examined was a 'clone' of another hard drive. An objection regarding the transport of desktops on airplanes was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018667.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. At the direction of an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Flatley reads aloud three paragraphs from a document he wrote, which describes the close, long-term relationship between individuals named Jeffrey and Ghislaine. The text characterizes them as a couple who are rarely apart and portrays Ghislaine as intelligent and personable.
DOJ-OGR-00018665.jpg
This page documents the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness is asked to read specific details from documents, including names of workers (John and Mary Alessi), information about 'Palm Beach House Maintenance' and a FedEx account, and metadata (author 'gmax' and 2002 timestamps) from a digital file labeled 418B.
DOJ-OGR-00018663.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on Word document metadata, specifically for Government Exhibit 420B, establishing that the author and the person who last saved the document are both listed as "gmax".
DOJ-OGR-00018662.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Flatley. Flatley confirms that specific government exhibits, identified as Microsoft Word documents, were saved within the documents folder of a Windows computer user account named 'Ghislaine'. The testimony includes a legal objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the questioning, which was overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018661.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibits 420B, 421B, and 422B. After the witness affirms their accuracy, the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the court without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00018660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, who identifies and authenticates Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422. Following his testimony and with no objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018659.jpg
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the review of evidence using forensic software. During the proceedings, Government Exhibit 418B is admitted without objection from Ms. Menninger, and Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 are presented for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00018658.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) is questioning a witness named Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibit 418B, which contains the metadata properties for Exhibit 418. The court also admits Exhibit 418 under seal due to the presence of third-party telephone numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00018657.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibits 418 and 418R, confirming they are accurate copies of a document he reviewed. Subsequently, Ms. Pomerantz offers the exhibits into evidence to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013096.jpg
This document is page 83 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley, who is subsequently excused by the judge while the jury is not present. The court then communicates with Ms. Pomerantz (representing the government) before declaring a recess.
Computer forensics and data access
A questioner cross-examines a witness named Flatley about how file metadata (created/modified dates) is generated by a computer system and how data was accessed from a password-protected computer using a cloned hard drive image and forensic software, bypassing the operating system.
Direct Examination
Questions regarding Flatley's background, role in CART, and experience.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity