DOJ-OGR-00001817.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This is page 2 of a court order dated November 5, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order outlines the procedure for the Government to request modification of its disclosure obligations if there are concerns about witness safety, national security, or other interests. It also lists six potential sanctions the Court may impose if the Government fails to comply with the disclosure order, ranging from specifying production terms to dismissing charges.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | United States District Judge |
Signed the court order.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
The entity subject to the disclosure order, defined as including federal, state, and local prosecutors and law-enforc...
|
| Court | government agency |
The entity issuing the order and empowered to modify obligations or impose sanctions for non-compliance.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-11-05
A court order was issued in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, detailing the Government's disclosure obligations and potential sanctions for non-compliance.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the order was dated and issued.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is an order from the Court directing the Government's actions regarding information disclosure and outlining the Court's power to impose sanctions on the Government for non-compliance.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,561 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 68 Filed 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2
In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise
witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other
substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations,
which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of
the information otherwise subject to disclosure.
witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other
substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations,
which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of
the information otherwise subject to disclosure.
For purposes of this Order, the Government includes all current or former federal, state, and
local prosecutors, law-enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the
prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the
defendant is charged. The Government has an affirmative obligation to seek from such sources all
information subject to disclosure under this Order.
local prosecutors, law-enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the
prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the
defendant is charged. The Government has an affirmative obligation to seek from such sources all
information subject to disclosure under this Order.
If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering
production of the information, may:
production of the information, may:
(1) specify the terms and conditions of such production;
(2) grant a continuance;
(3) impose evidentiary sanctions;
(4) impose sanctions on any responsible lawyer for the Government;
(5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or
(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 5, 2020
New York, New York
New York, New York
[Signature of Alison J. Nathan]
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00001817
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document