DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
608 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
608 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a judge's oral ruling, filed on July 26, 2019. The judge explains the decision to deny a bail package, finding that the government has sufficiently proven the defendant is both a danger to the community, including minor victims, and a flight risk. The judge deems the proposed bail package "irretrievably inadequate" and expresses doubt that any conditions could mitigate the danger posed.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Speaker | Judge |
The speaker of the text, explaining their decision on a legal matter, likely a judge explaining a ruling.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-26
A judge explains the reasoning for denying a proposed bail package, citing the defendant's danger to the community and risk of flight.
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
the government
the defense
Relationships (1)
the government
→
Adversarial (Legal)
→
the defense
The document describes a legal proceeding where the government argued against a bail package proposed by the defense.
Key Quotes (4)
"I think it is fair to say that it is the heart of this decision, that is to say, dealing with danger to others and to the community."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
(Explaining the central theme of the ruling.)
DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
Quote #1
"Specifically, I find in the decision and order that the government has established dangerousness to others and to the community by clear and convincing evidence and also that the government has established risk of flight by a preponderance of the evidence."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
(Stating the specific legal findings that form the basis of the decision.)
DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
Quote #2
"I also reject the proposed bail package as irretrievably inadequate and go on in some detail concerning what I consider to be its deficiencies."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
(Stating the rejection of the defense's proposal for bail.)
DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
Quote #3
"I doubt that any bail package can overcome danger to the community."Source
— Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
(Expressing skepticism that any conditions of release would be sufficient to ensure community safety.)
DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,574 characters)
JCase 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 40 Filed 07/26/19 Page 3 of 6 3
1 submissions. Those are the written submissions: principally
2 the indictment, the legal principles governing release versus
3 remand, the presumption of remand in 18 U.S.C. section 1591
4 cases, danger to others and the community. This topic has
5 seven subsections and fills over ten pages of the decision and
6 order. I think it is fair to say that it is the heart of this
7 decision, that is to say, dealing with danger to others and to
8 the community.
9 Then I deal with risk of flight. That has four
10 subsections or factors, which are substantially the same
11 factors that are used to analyze dangerousness.
12 Then, finally, the bail package proposed by the
13 defense. Specifically, I find in the decision and order that
14 the government has established dangerousness to others and to
15 the community by clear and convincing evidence and also that
16 the government has established risk of flight by a
17 preponderance of the evidence. I also reject the proposed bail
18 package as irretrievably inadequate and go on in some detail
19 concerning what I consider to be its deficiencies.
20 Incidentally, I am not suggesting that a different
21 bail package would be appropriate because I doubt that any bail
22 package can overcome danger to the community.
23 I focus then on dangerousness to others, most
24 certainly including the minor victims in this case and
25 prospective victims as well. I cite and quote, for example,
2 the indictment, the legal principles governing release versus
3 remand, the presumption of remand in 18 U.S.C. section 1591
4 cases, danger to others and the community. This topic has
5 seven subsections and fills over ten pages of the decision and
6 order. I think it is fair to say that it is the heart of this
7 decision, that is to say, dealing with danger to others and to
8 the community.
9 Then I deal with risk of flight. That has four
10 subsections or factors, which are substantially the same
11 factors that are used to analyze dangerousness.
12 Then, finally, the bail package proposed by the
13 defense. Specifically, I find in the decision and order that
14 the government has established dangerousness to others and to
15 the community by clear and convincing evidence and also that
16 the government has established risk of flight by a
17 preponderance of the evidence. I also reject the proposed bail
18 package as irretrievably inadequate and go on in some detail
19 concerning what I consider to be its deficiencies.
20 Incidentally, I am not suggesting that a different
21 bail package would be appropriate because I doubt that any bail
22 package can overcome danger to the community.
23 I focus then on dangerousness to others, most
24 certainly including the minor victims in this case and
25 prospective victims as well. I cite and quote, for example,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000607
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document