Unnamed speaker
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the Judge
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Honor
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
clients
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client (implied Jeffrey Epstein)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Parse
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Indirect association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MP
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Lynn
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Shaffer
|
Conversation debate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Benjamin Harnwell
|
Professional ideological |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Medical event | The speaker was hospitalized with a nervous breakdown, which was the first of over two dozen hosp... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault | Jeffrey Epstein stole the speaker's virginity, washed her body in the shower, and threatened to k... | a shower | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | The speaker describes repeated "depraved sessions" of molestation and grooming that occurred over... | his private massage room | View |
| N/A | Crime | Sex trafficking of women, children, and minors by Ghislaine, who supplied them to Jeffrey Epstein... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | The speaker describes being subjected to molestation and sickening manipulation that Ghislaine ar... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | An unnamed victim provides testimony about their experience of manipulation and abuse, explaining... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | An unidentified speaker and their group waited to meet a man named Jeff. They were let in by a bo... | An unspecified location wit... | View |
| N/A | Meetings | The speaker met with the unnamed male subject 'hundreds' of times over a period of 'months'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Assault | The unnamed male subject escalated physical contact by putting his hand/fingers inside the speake... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The speaker took a trip to New York, for which the unnamed male subject provided a plane ticket. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conference or Presentation | Unknown (Venue with a P.A. ... | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A speaker, likely a judge, is instructing the jury before a holiday break. They are told to retur... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The speaker met with an influential man who impressed them with his wisdom, connections, and pers... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Application sabotage | The speaker's application to FIT was repeatedly criticized and found to have faults by Maxwell, p... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Coercion / abuse | Epstein and Maxwell put the speaker on a strict Atkins diet while also sending her to a psychiatr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Assault of Unnamed Speaker | Epstein's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Speaker introduced 'him' to women, explicitly stating 'not underage women'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Disclosure | The speaker disclosed the abuse they suffered to friends and medical providers for the first time. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Traumatic experience | The speaker experienced traumatizing events over a three-year period. | New York and Florida | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Victim impact statement | An unnamed speaker delivers a statement about their experience with Ghislaine, describing her cha... | Court proceeding | View |
| 2023-02-28 | Court proceeding | A discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding how to respond to a jury's question about ... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court regarding whether certain materials are covered by privilege. An unnamed sp... | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A legal argument concerning jury instructions for the terms 'persuasion,' 'inducement,' 'enticeme... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | An unnamed speaker (likely an attorney) argues before a judge that the government's lack of thoro... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A discussion took place in court regarding the appropriateness of sending new legal instructions ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022857.tif
This document is a page from a transcript or testimony, where the speaker discusses a cultural shift from the 1990s to the 2000s and references an investigation in Palm Beach involving underage women. The speaker clarifies that they introduced 'him' (the subject of discussion) to women, but not underage ones, and denies ever going to a school to pick up a child for illicit purposes, mentioning their stepchildren.
DOJ-OGR-00014812.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely a victim impact statement in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker, a victim, condemns Ghislaine's lack of remorse and refusal to take responsibility for trafficking women and children to Jeffrey Epstein and others. The speaker argues that no personal hardship, such as a difficult childhood, can excuse the gravity of her crimes and believes her lack of remorse indicates she would commit them again.
DOJ-OGR-00000718.jpg
This document is a page from a victim's statement in the legal case against Jeffrey Epstein, filed on September 3, 2019. The victim provides a harrowing account of systematic sexual abuse, describing how Epstein groomed and molested her in his private massage room over several years. She recounts how he stole her virginity and then threatened to kill her, leaving her feeling powerless and describing their relationship as that of a slave to her master.
DOJ-OGR-00000717.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a victim impact statement, in which the speaker recounts their experience with a powerful and influential man. The speaker describes being manipulated through displays of power, such as phone calls to celebrities and claims of friendship with heads of state. The man specifically promised the speaker a letter of recommendation to Harvard, preying on their vulnerabilities and leading the speaker to conclude, 'I was the perfect victim'.
DOJ-OGR-00000691.jpg
This court transcript from September 3, 2019, captures a judge's opinion that the law is outdated regarding civil cases against deceased individuals. A representative for Mr. Epstein's victims then states their intention to pursue legal action against not only Epstein's estate but also his co-conspirators and enablers, who they allege were essential to his crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00000688.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, capturing a dialogue between an unnamed speaker and a judge. The speaker commends the judge for allowing victims to be heard, citing it as a positive example that aligns with the Crime Victims Rights Act, and urges the judge to publish their remarks to guide other courts. The judge expresses gratitude for the speaker's presence and comments.
DOJ-OGR-00000685.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. It features a concluding statement from an unnamed victim expressing relief that Epstein can no longer harm anyone, followed by attorney Mr. Edwards introducing a letter from an absent client, Michelle Licata. Ms. Licata's statement, read by Brittany Henderson, describes abuse occurring while she was in high school and criticizes the government for the previous 'secret deal' (Non-Prosecution Agreement) made with Epstein without her knowledge.
DOJ-OGR-00000676.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unnamed victim testifies about a manipulative and abusive experience. The speaker uses an analogy of a frog in boiling water to explain the gradual nature of the abuse, which made it hard to recognize, and emphasizes that the victims were vulnerable and impoverished, not attempting to extort money. The testimony highlights the psychological impact, including intense self-blame and the burden of keeping the experience a secret.
DOJ-OGR-00000558.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in which a defense lawyer argues for home detention for their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer outlines a series of strict proposed conditions, including a visitor list limited to the legal team, removal of cell phones, and consent to monitoring and searches. To support the argument, the lawyer cites a precedent from a 20-year-old organized crime case they argued before Former Chief Judge Mark Wolf.
DOJ-OGR-00000515.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, for a bail proceeding in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. The judge is addressing the prosecution ('the government') and the defense, outlining the two charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and substantive sex trafficking. The judge references the relevant statute, 18 U.S. Code, Section 1591, and the Bail Reform Act, highlighting the unusual legal presumption in such cases that no conditions can ensure the defendant's appearance and the community's safety.
DOJ-OGR-00021042.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 28, 2023, in which a judge explains the legal basis for applying specific sentencing enhancements to a defendant. The judge refutes the defendant's arguments that guideline 4B1.5(b) requires a finding of future danger and outlines the necessary factual findings for applying a leadership role enhancement under guideline 3B1.1(a).
DOJ-OGR-00020838.jpg
This court transcript page, dated February 28, 2023, documents a discussion between a judge and attorneys about how to properly respond to a jury's question. The attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe, present conflicting views on which specific jury instructions are relevant to the jury's query concerning 'Count Four'. The judge expresses difficulty in understanding the jury's exact question and considers following the government's suggestion.
DOJ-OGR-00022008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 10, 2020. In it, a defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm requires more than 90 days to prepare a defense, which involves reviewing at least 25 witness statements and tracking down witnesses. The attorney contrasts their limited resources with the extensive time and resources the federal government used to investigate and bring an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00021616.jpg
This legal document is a personal statement from an unnamed victim detailing the psychological abuse and control exerted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker recounts how they sabotaged her application to the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT), manipulated her weight through a contradictory diet and medication regimen, and created a 'no-win situation' she likens to human trafficking. The statement concludes by mentioning her escape to the U.K. in 2007 and her subsequent, ongoing struggles with severe mental health issues, including PTSD.
DOJ-OGR-00021611.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement from a legal proceeding dated June 29, 2023. An unnamed speaker, who has known Ghislaine for many years, describes her as a manipulative and cruel person who uses kindness for personal gain. The speaker expresses solidarity with other victims and declares their own empowerment and resilience in overcoming the trauma inflicted by Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00016922.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge instructs the jury before a weekend recess. The judge stresses the importance of following all instructions, specifically forbidding any communication or consumption of information about the case, and reminds them to keep an open mind until deliberations. The jury is ordered to return on Monday at 9:00 AM.
DOJ-OGR-00031484.jpg
This document is a transcript of a police interview dated October 11, 2005, where an unnamed individual details her relationship with an unnamed man. She describes being paid hundreds of dollars per visit, receiving gifts like a Dodge Neon and plane tickets, under the rule of no penetration. The relationship, which she terms as being a 'sex slave', escalated over months until he violated her rule by putting his fingers inside her.
DOJ-OGR-00031410.jpg
This document is a faxed printout of the final page of a New York Magazine article regarding Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a quote regarding potential financial payout, commentary by Josè Lambiet on the class dynamics of the Palm Beach case, and criticism of Epstein's lack of understanding regarding the damage caused to high-school girls. The document includes fax headers from 2008 and DOJ public records stamps from 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (represented by Ms. Moe and others) and the defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the timeline for redacting government and defense exhibits. The Court agrees to allow the parties to resolve these redaction issues and an attorney-client privilege issue over the upcoming weekend.
DOJ-OGR-00013274.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about attorney-client privilege. An unnamed speaker outlines three reasons why certain materials should not be considered privileged, including that they were intended for a third party or would lose privilege if shown to the government. The judge acknowledges the argument but notes a prior ruling, after which counsel for the government (Ms. Moe) and other lawyers (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Pagliuca) indicate they have no further points on the matter at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00004672.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript from a grand jury proceeding, filed on May 25, 2021. An unnamed speaker is explaining an 'aid' document to the jury, which links specific grand jury testimony pages to 'Overt Acts' and 'substantive counts'. The testimony concerns an unnamed female's activities and her connection to 'Mr. Epstein and his assistants', with the speaker referencing their own prior testimony from May 8, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00004668.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript, filed on May 25, 2021. The witness details the issuance of multiple subpoenas to various companies, including Bear Sterns and Wolf Camera, to gather evidence such as ticketing records, personnel files, and financial transaction data. The testimony indicates that while some subpoenas successfully yielded records, others resulted in responses indicating no records were found.
DOJ-OGR-00011687.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's instructions to a jury in a criminal case. The judge strictly forbids jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including family, and from conducting any personal research or investigation using news, the internet, or other means. Jurors are instructed to immediately report any attempts at outside communication directly to the judge's deputy, Ms. Williams, and to no one else, including fellow jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00011605.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, containing a statement from an individual being sentenced in a case related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker, who claims to have never met Epstein but was associated with someone who did, apologizes to the victims for their pain and hopes their conviction brings closure. They express that Epstein is the one who should have faced prosecution years ago and lament the personal relationships they have lost due to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00011602.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely from a sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. The speaker, presumably her attorney, argues for a lenient sentence by highlighting her age (over 60), lack of prior criminal history, and positive contributions while incarcerated, such as tutoring fellow inmates in the MDC. The attorney contrasts her good character with the 'terrible conduct' for which she is being sentenced.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Unnamed speaker | $0.00 | Speaker describes Epstein 'basically put money ... | View |
Establishing rules of contact
The speaker told the male subject her rule that he was not allowed to put anything inside of her.
Global populist revolt and capitalism
Discussion about Eric Cantor's loss, global populist movements, and the difference between free-market and crony capitalism.
Purpose of Jane's travel from New Mexico
An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for the purpose of illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present. The speaker contrasts this with Jane's testimony that her trip to New Mexico was for that purpose.
Victim impact statement
An unnamed speaker describes her experience as a survivor, stating she will no longer cover up what happened. She names Jeffrey, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sarah Kellen, and calls for Maxwell and Kellen to be held accountable.
Victims' Rights and Judicial Guidance
An unnamed speaker addresses the court, praising the judge's decision to allow victims to be heard and encouraging the publication of the judge's remarks as a guide for other judges, referencing the Crime Victims Rights Act. The judge responds, thanking the speaker for being present.
Victims' Rights and Judicial Guidance
An unnamed speaker addresses the court, praising the judge's decision to allow victims to be heard and encouraging the publication of the judge's remarks as a guide for other judges, referencing the Crime Victims Rights Act. The judge responds, thanking the speaker for being present.
Jail conditions and need for court supervision of investi...
An unnamed speaker addresses a judge, arguing for the court's involvement in an investigation. The speaker highlights the dreadful conditions of the local jail, affecting Jeffrey Epstein and others, comparing them unfavorably to Guantanamo, and stresses the importance of public confidence in the justice system.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity