HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg

1.23 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size: 1.23 MB
Summary

This document is page 124 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The witness, advised by attorney Mr. Scarola to invoke common interest privilege, refuses to answer whether their legal team communicated with Mr. Josefsburg. The testimony discusses a complaint signed by Josefsburg using the term 'academicians,' which the witness interprets as evidence against Alan Dershowitz, noting that a partner in Josefsburg's firm subsequently questioned Dershowitz about a sex abuse matter.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Scarola Attorney
Counsel advising the witness not to answer based on common interest privilege.
Mr. Simpson Attorney
Questioner conducting the deposition.
Mr. Josefsburg Attorney/Individual
Signed a complaint using the term 'academicians'; witness has not met him.
Alan Dershowitz Professor/Academician
Subject of the discussion; referred to as 'Professor Dershowitz' and 'an academician'.
The Witness Deponent
Unidentified individual giving testimony, represented by Mr. Scarola.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (2 events)

Prior to deposition
Filing of a complaint by Mr. Josefsburg containing the term 'academicians'.
Unknown
Shortly after complaint filed
A partner in Josefsburg's firm began asking Alan Dershowitz questions about the sex abuse matter.
Unknown
Alan Dershowitz Unnamed Partner

Relationships (2)

The Witness Attorney-Client Mr. Scarola
Witness refers to Scarola as 'my counsel's advice'.
Mr. Josefsburg Adversarial/Legal Alan Dershowitz
Josefsburg signed a complaint viewed as evidence against Dershowitz.

Key Quotes (3)

"To the extent that that question would call for a communication within the common interest privilege, you should not answer it."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Josefsburg had signed a complaint with a generic term 'academicians' in it was some evidence, in your mind, against Professor Dershowitz?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes, because he's an academician and shortly after the complaint was filed, a partner in his firm began asking Alan Dershowitz questions about the sex abuse matter that we are discussing here."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,045 characters)

124
1 A. Did I personally do that?
2 Q. Yes.
3 A. No. To my knowledge, I've never met
4 Mr. Josefsburg, so no.
5 Q. To your knowledge, did anyone else in the
6 group of attorneys you were working with ask
7 Mr. Josefsburg that question?
8 MR. SCAROLA: Excuse me. To the extent that
9 that question would call for a communication
10 within the common interest privilege, you should
11 not answer it.
12 THE WITNESS: I'm going take my counsel's
13 advice. I can't answer that.
14 BY MR. SIMPSON:
15 Q. You're not going to answer whether to your
16 knowledge anyone asked Mr. Josefsburg?
17 A. Right.
18 Q. But you are testifying that the fact that
19 Mr. Josefsburg had signed a complaint with a generic
20 term "academicians" in it was some evidence, in your
21 mind, against Professor Dershowitz?
22 A. Yes, because he's an academician and shortly
23 after the complaint was filed, a partner in his firm
24 began asking Alan Dershowitz questions about the sex
25 abuse matter that we are discussing here.
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document