DOJ-OGR-00018844.jpg

524 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 524 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Carolyn's submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, highlighting the claimed start date of abuse as May 1, 2001, and questioning whether she added new, specific claims of sexual abuse, which Carolyn vehemently denies as a 'lie'.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined. Referred to as 'THE WITNESS' and answers questions with '...
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney/Questioner
Asks questions (indicated by 'Q.') to the witness, Carolyn, during a cross-examination.
Epstein Alleged abuser
Mentioned in the context of the 'Epstein Victim Compensation Fund' and as the person Carolyn claimed abused her.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund Victim compensation fund
A fund to which the witness, Carolyn, made a submission for compensation for alleged abuse by Epstein.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Court reporting agency
Listed at the bottom of the page as the entity that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (2 events)

2001-05-01
The beginning date of alleged abuse by Epstein against Carolyn, as claimed in her Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission.
Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines the witness, Carolyn, about her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA Professional/Legal Carolyn
Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, who is a witness in a legal proceeding.
Carolyn Victim/Alleged Abuser Epstein
The transcript discusses Carolyn's claim that Epstein abused her, which she submitted to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.

Key Quotes (1)

"Absolutely not. That's a lie."
Source
— Carolyn (In response to a question from Mr. Pagliuca asking if her Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission was different from prior lawsuits because she added claims of specific sexual acts.)
DOJ-OGR-00018844.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,295 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 246 of 264 1687
LC7Cmax8 Carolyn - cross
1 A. Can you repeat the question.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. If we can show the witness page
3 3 of C6, please.
4 THE WITNESS: What is your question now?
5 Q. I'm looking in the middle of the page, would that refresh
6 your memory as to what the date was you were claiming the
7 beginning date in the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund to get
8 compensation?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. And that's May 1st, 2001; correct?
11 A. Wait. Can you ask me the question again, because --
12 Q. In your Epstein victim fund compensation submission, you
13 were claiming Epstein abused you beginning May 1, 2001;
14 correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. And that's different from the two lawsuits that you
17 filed --
18 A. Yes. I've already answered that question for you.
19 Q. Okay. This Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission is
20 also different because you added claims of vaginal penetration
21 with fingers, sex toys, oral sex, and forged intercourse?
22 A. Absolutely not. That's a lie.
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: If we can show the witness page 4 of 11
24 in that same exhibit.
25 Q. Does that refresh your recollection that, with the Epstein
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018844

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document