Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Claimant beneficiary |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted individuals (present in the house)
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Beneficiary |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Financial award | A. Farmer received an award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
EFTA00029867.pdf
This document is a summary of a witness preparation interview conducted on July 13, 2021, likely for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness provides clarifying details regarding her interactions with 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell), including receiving money ($300), FedEx packages containing 'Massage for Dummies', and being seen nude by GM at age 16. The witness also mentions abuse by an individual named 'SH', sex acts with a 'fat bald man' at JE's house, and her participation in the victim compensation fund.
EFTA00019915.pdf
This document is a summary of a trial preparation interview conducted on June 7, 2021, by the USAO with a witness/victim in the Epstein case. The notes detail that the witness received a $3.5 million award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she used for housing, transportation, and family support. The witness reported mental health struggles involving dreams of Epstein and disclosed that she lied about her age (claiming to be 17 when younger) to a redacted individual (presumably Epstein or an associate) while dating.
EFTA00014671.pdf
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated May 12, 2021, arguing for the enforcement of a subpoena for evidence controlled by the law firm Boies, Schiller, and Flexner (BSF). The defense seeks the full production of a journal kept by 'Accuser-2' in 1996, arguing that the government is relying on selective excerpts to support its case while ignoring potentially exculpatory context in the rest of the journal. The letter also addresses disputes over the production of a pair of boots and original photographs, accusing the government of interfering with the defense's investigation and practicing 'selective ignorance.'
EFTA00010240.pdf
Email exchange between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. The defense is seeking to subpoena information from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund regarding a specific (redacted) individual. The AUSA states their intention to file a motion to quash this subpoena to protect the victim's information.
DOJ-OGR-00018849.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) covering the redirect examination of a witness named Carolyn. During this segment, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca finishes his questioning regarding a photo exhibit (C10), after which prosecutor Ms. Comey questions Carolyn about the authorship of her civil complaint and her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, to which Carolyn admits she did not write them herself. The page concludes with a question regarding an FBI interview report.
DOJ-OGR-00018845.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen in 2008-2009 and a subsequent claim she made to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn denies adding a 'Ms. Maxwell' to her fund request and, after her memory is refreshed, clarifies she was awarded $2,804,000, not the suggested amounts of $3.25 million or $3.9 million.
DOJ-OGR-00018844.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Carolyn's submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, highlighting the claimed start date of abuse as May 1, 2001, and questioning whether she added new, specific claims of sexual abuse, which Carolyn vehemently denies as a 'lie'.
DOJ-OGR-00018843.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines a witness named Carolyn regarding her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submitted on October 14, 2020. The questioning highlights that this submission occurred while she was meeting with the government and distinguishes this claim from her separate lawsuits against Epstein and Kellen.
DOJ-OGR-00018842.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on Carolyn's meetings with the government in 2020, which she attended with Mr. Scarola and other lawyers, and their potential connection to her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn consistently responds that she cannot recall the details of these meetings.
DOJ-OGR-00018840.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Pagliuca questions the witness about the timing of her cooperation with the government, specifically attempting to link her first response in July 2020 to the opening of the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund in June 2020. The witness denies knowing about the fund opening date but confirms responding through her attorneys, Mr. Danchuk and Mr. Scarola.
DOJ-OGR-00018777.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning covers Carolyn's past, including a 2008 lawsuit she filed against Epstein and Sarah Kellen, her move from Florida to Georgia in 2003, and her legal representation by Jack Scarola for a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00018474.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the testimony of a witness named Kate. Under questioning by Ms. Pomerantz, Kate explains that money received from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund represented recognition of her pain and truth, rather than just financial gain, and she explicitly denies having a financial stake in the outcome of the current trial. The page concludes with Ms. Sternheim beginning recross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018421.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The testimony covers her involvement with a now-defunct foundation launched in 2019, her receipt of a settlement from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund approximately one year prior, and her cooperation with the government. It also confirms she made a public statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein at the courthouse in 2019 using her true name.
DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00019319.jpg
This document is the third page of a legal letter from attorney David Boies to Judge Debra C. Freeman, dated May 18, 2020, regarding a civil case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Boies argues that the court should deny Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and her request for a pre-motion conference, citing Judge Schofield's previous comments that Maxwell's motion to dismiss lacks merit. The letter also asserts that the existence of the Epstein Estate's Victim Compensation Fund (in the Virgin Islands probate court) is not a valid reason to stay the current action without the Plaintiff's consent.
DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a rebuttal argument delivered by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. Comey refutes the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) were manipulated by greedy lawyers to fabricate a story about Maxwell for financial gain from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. She argues there is no evidence for this conspiracy and highlights that one witness's lawyer worked pro bono, which contradicts the alleged financial motive.
DOJ-OGR-00016409.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as A. Farmer. The testimony covers A. Farmer's past interactions with the FBI in 2006 and 2020, and an award received from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which A. Farmer describes as a significant amount providing security for their family. The transcript also records objections and rulings by attorneys Ms. Menninger and Ms. Pomerantz, and the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00016408.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer. In the testimony, Farmer affirms she has not coordinated her testimony with other witnesses or been told what to say. She states her purpose for testifying is to hold Ghislaine Maxwell accountable for harm caused. The questioning then pivots to Farmer's application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00013260.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen in 2008-2009 and a subsequent claim to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn denies including Ms. Maxwell in her claim and corrects the compensation amount she received from $3.25 million or $3.9 million to $2,804,000.
DOJ-OGR-00013259.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions a witness named Carolyn about her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. The questioning focuses on the alleged start date of abuse by Epstein (May 1, 2001) and highlights alleged inconsistencies between this submission and two prior lawsuits. Specifically, the attorney suggests she added new claims of sexual acts, which Carolyn vehemently denies, calling the assertion a "lie."
DOJ-OGR-00013258.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on confirming the submission date of Carolyn's application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund as October 14, 2020, using an exhibit to refresh her memory. The transcript also establishes that this fund submission is a separate matter from two lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen.
DOJ-OGR-00013257.jpg
This court transcript page, dated August 10, 2022, documents the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on whether Carolyn attended meetings with the government in 2020, specifically in July, alongside Mr. Scarola and other lawyers, and if these meetings coincided with a submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn consistently responds that she cannot recall or does not recall the meetings.
DOJ-OGR-00013255.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her communications with the government in 2020. The questioning attempts to link her cooperation with the government to the timeline of the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund opening in June 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00013192.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning establishes that Carolyn filed a lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2008 and was represented by lawyer Jack Scarola in a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. The transcript also mentions that Carolyn moved from Florida to Georgia in 2003 after being told by someone named Sarah that Epstein wanted to take her photograph.
DOJ-OGR-00013784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms she first spoke with the FBI in 2006 without a lawyer present and acknowledges receiving a significant financial award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Farmer states the money provides security for her family and explicitly denies having any financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity