DOJ-OGR-00016492.jpg
621 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
6
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
621 KB
Summary
This court transcript captures a dialogue between defense counsel Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding the timeline of Ms. Maxwell's ownership and residency at a property in the UK. Mr. Everdell explains the complex leasehold title, stating the deal closed in early 1997, to argue that Ms. Maxwell did not live there before 1996. This evidence is intended to counter testimony from a witness, Kate, about alleged events at the property in 1994 and 1995.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, likely defense counsel, explaining the details of a property title and the purpose of pres...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Everdell, referring to the judge presiding over the case.
|
| Duke of Westminster | Landowner |
Mentioned as the historical possessor of the land since 1500, illustrating the complicated title history.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Subject of discussion |
The person whose property purchase and residency timeline is being debated. The defense is trying to prove she did no...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning counsel to clarify the purpose of the evidence being presented.
|
| Kate | Witness |
A witness mentioned by Mr. Everdell who has testified about events at the Kinnerton Street property and when Ms. Maxw...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (6 events)
1994 and 1995
A witness, Kate, has testified to events that allegedly took place at the Kinnerton Street property.
Kinnerton Street property
1997
Ms. Maxwell actually took possession of the property, according to witness Kate.
Kinnerton Street property
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to the Duke of Westminster, who has possessed the land since 1500.
|
|
|
The location of the property and its 'very complicated chain of title'.
|
|
|
The specific property being discussed, where events allegedly took place in '94 and '95.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell represents the 'defense's proffer' concerning Ms. Maxwell, indicating he is her legal counsel.
Kate is a witness who has testified about events allegedly involving Ms. Maxwell and about when Ms. Maxwell took possession of a property.
Key Quotes (3)
"And again, my question is not that it's to prove when Ms. Maxwell purchased the home, but the defense's proffer from counsel is that it is to prove that she did not live there before 1996?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge clarifying the purpose of the defense's evidence regarding the property records.)
DOJ-OGR-00016492.jpg
Quote #1
"We have a witness, Kate, who says -- she didn't live there before 1997, because that's when she actually took possession of the property, right."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining how a witness's testimony supports the defense's timeline of Ms. Maxwell's residency.)
DOJ-OGR-00016492.jpg
Quote #2
"We have a witness, Kate, who has testified to events that allegedly took place in the Kinnerton Street property in '94 and '95. And these records show that she didn't own that"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Contrasting allegations from a witness with property records to challenge the timeline of events.)
DOJ-OGR-00016492.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,604 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 246 2304
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
1 could, the cover letter. Do we know why it's dated 2010?
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think that's a separate
3 record. Because I think that record reflects that there was an
4 opportunity to purchase the leasehold outright in 2010. It's a
5 little bit of a complicated title. It's actually a leasehold.
6 She does own the lease; it's effectively owning it, b.ut this
7 land, I think, has been in the possession of the Duke of
8 Westminster since, you know, 1500. It's a very complicated
9 chain of title in the UK.
10 But the way it works is you pass the leasehold from
11 one person to another. And that is effectively ownership under
12 the land registry records. And that leasehold passed in -- the
13 contracts were exchanged in '96, and the deal closed in '97, in
14 January '97; and it was registered in a land registry as a
15 transfer of that title in March of '97.
16 THE COURT: And again, my question is not that it's to
17 prove when Ms. Maxwell purchased the home, but the defense's
18 proffer from counsel is that it is to prove that she did not
19 live there before 1996?
20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right. We have a witness, Kate,
21 who says -- she didn't live there before 1997, because that's
22 when she actually took possession of the property, right.
23 We have a witness, Kate, who has testified to events
24 that allegedly took place in the Kinnerton Street property in
25 '94 and '95. And these records show that she didn't own that
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think that's a separate
3 record. Because I think that record reflects that there was an
4 opportunity to purchase the leasehold outright in 2010. It's a
5 little bit of a complicated title. It's actually a leasehold.
6 She does own the lease; it's effectively owning it, b.ut this
7 land, I think, has been in the possession of the Duke of
8 Westminster since, you know, 1500. It's a very complicated
9 chain of title in the UK.
10 But the way it works is you pass the leasehold from
11 one person to another. And that is effectively ownership under
12 the land registry records. And that leasehold passed in -- the
13 contracts were exchanged in '96, and the deal closed in '97, in
14 January '97; and it was registered in a land registry as a
15 transfer of that title in March of '97.
16 THE COURT: And again, my question is not that it's to
17 prove when Ms. Maxwell purchased the home, but the defense's
18 proffer from counsel is that it is to prove that she did not
19 live there before 1996?
20 MR. EVERDELL: That's right. We have a witness, Kate,
21 who says -- she didn't live there before 1997, because that's
22 when she actually took possession of the property, right.
23 We have a witness, Kate, who has testified to events
24 that allegedly took place in the Kinnerton Street property in
25 '94 and '95. And these records show that she didn't own that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016492
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document