This document is an email chain from December 2020 discussing extradition law, specifically concerning the enforceability of a defendant's consent to extradition from the UK to the US. The emails involve individuals from the US Department of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service, clarifying that consent given in the US would not be binding in the UK and that a UK judge must independently verify extradition compliance with UK law. The discussion centers on a UK citizen, detained in the US, attempting to use prophylactic consent to extradition as proof of not being a flight risk for bail purposes.
This court transcript captures a dialogue between defense counsel Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding the timeline of Ms. Maxwell's ownership and residency at a property in the UK. Mr. Everdell explains the complex leasehold title, stating the deal closed in early 1997, to argue that Ms. Maxwell did not live there before 1996. This evidence is intended to counter testimony from a witness, Kate, about alleged events at the property in 1994 and 1995.
A page from a manuscript, dated April 2012, recounting the narrator's (highly likely Alan Dershowitz) early experiences as a young professor at Harvard Law. Anecdotes include attending the Magna Carta anniversary in London, missing a chance to see the Beatles in Paris, being addressed as 'Ass Prof' by his mother, and executing a classroom prank with philosopher friend Robert Nozick to humble an arrogant student. The text also cites a Harvard Law Record article discussing his appointment at age 24 and his unconventional teaching curriculum.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity