HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299.jpg
1.52 MB
Extraction Summary
11
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Political strategy memo
File Size:
1.52 MB
Summary
This document is a political strategy memo arguing for the viability of a centrist, third-party presidential candidate in the 2020 U.S. election. Citing the 'failed' 2016 election, high disapproval of Donald Trump, and a leftward shift in the Democratic party, the author suggests the electorate is open to an alternative. The memo brainstorms several 'radical' bipartisan tickets, such as Biden/Romney and Bill Gates/Hogan, as possibilities.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Trump | Political Figure |
Mentioned as a potential 2020 candidate whose high disapproval ratings create an opportunity for a third party.
|
| Biden | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Romney.
|
| Romney | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential vice-presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Biden.
|
| Bill Gates | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Hogan.
|
| Hogan | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential vice-presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Bill Gates.
|
| Bloomberg | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Haley.
|
| Haley | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential vice-presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Bloomberg.
|
| Howard Schultz | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Bob Corker.
|
| Bob Corker | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential vice-presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Howard Schultz.
|
| Sandberg | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Kasich.
|
| Kasich | Potential Candidate |
Proposed as a potential vice-presidential candidate on a bipartisan ticket with Sandberg.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic Party |
Mentioned as one of the two major parties, with an 'increasingly leftward drift' creating an opening for a centrist c...
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears in the document footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299), suggesting the document is part of a collection submitted to...
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a state with an outsized role in the presidential nominating process.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a state with an outsized role in the presidential nominating process.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of democratic and moral values.
|
Relationships (5)
Listed as a potential 'radical combination' for a presidential ticket in the document.
Listed as a potential 'radical combination' for a presidential ticket in the document.
Listed as a potential 'radical combination' for a presidential ticket in the document.
Listed as a potential 'radical combination' for a presidential ticket in the document.
Key Quotes (3)
"The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299.jpg
Quote #1
"As a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299.jpg
Quote #2
"Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,261 characters)
support him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and seemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play such outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again.
It's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for whatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take those bets.
The ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination of both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, democratic – and moral – values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this on the national stage now.
As a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich?
As we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary system in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot and presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter turn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a combination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of candidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique – and purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026299
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document