This document appears to be a page from a political risk or market analysis report distributed via email by IND-X Advisors Limited. It analyzes the incoming Trump administration's energy policies, predicting a strong shift toward fossil fuels, climate change denial, and deregulation driven by figures like Tom Pyle, the Koch Brothers, and Steve Bannon. The text highlights the potential economic resurgence of specific oil and gas-producing states.
An email from 'jeffrey E.' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) to 'BS Stern' dated August 9, 2018. The sender discusses the political climate involving Donald Trump, the Mueller investigation, and Brett Kavanaugh, while proposing the idea of a 'third choice presidential run' and a 'chaos candidate' for 2020 as a back-up plan to the traditional two-party system.
This document is page 98 of a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020557), containing endnotes 3 through 19. The citations primarily document Chinese state media influence operations, propaganda efforts under Xi Jinping, and the activities of James Su (CEO of EDI) in facilitating Chinese broadcasting in the US. Sources include Reuters, Xinhua, The New York Times, and FCC filings. There is no text related to Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document is Page 26 of a 78-page document, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article written by David Schoen. The text provides a legal argument criticizing the "Advisory Committee's" proposals regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against rules that would force victims to disclose their addresses to defendants or participate in face-to-face meetings/depositions without due process. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production.
A page from a manuscript or memoir (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) describing backstage preparations for a performance. The narrator describes fellow performers Peter and Harry preparing, while the narrator hides to smoke marijuana. The text explicitly discusses an interaction with an associate named Scott regarding the narrator's performance while high, noting the irony that Scott sold the drugs used.
This document is a political analysis report produced by Laffer Associates, dated July 6, 2016. It presents statistical tables comparing Republican and Democrat voter turnout in various state primaries and caucuses between 2008, 2012, and 2016. The analysis concludes that the data should be concerning for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document discusses Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State, highlighting the demanding nature of the role compared to her 2008 campaign and her working relationship with President Obama. It contrasts the methodical thinking styles of Hillary and Obama with the more discursive style of Bill Clinton, while noting that despite surface similarities, underlying differences and staff frustrations remain.
An email exchange from February 3, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and an unidentified individual. The individual boasts about receiving more votes than Jeb Bush in Iowa and mentions potentially being a delegate for the Republican convention supporting Trump. The individual also recounts a recent trip to St. Thomas where they scuba dived off 'St. Jeff' (Epstein's island) and suggests installing a fake shark underwater as a prank.
An email sent to Jeffrey Epstein on February 3, 2016, from a redacted sender who appears to be politically active. The sender boasts about receiving more votes than Jeb Bush in Iowa, expresses support for Donald Trump, and recounts a recent trip to St. Thomas where they dove off 'St. Jeff' (a reference to Epstein's property).
This document is a data analysis report titled 'US Election Report' bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details sentiment analysis derived from approximately 3 million tweets collected from November 1st (presumably 2016), comparing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It provides positive/neutral/negative sentiment percentages, overall winning chances favoring Trump (55%), and a breakdown of projected polling or winning chances across various specific US states.
This document is a financial research note from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, dated November 17, 2016, summarizing discussions from its 'Future of Financials Conference'. It analyzes investor sentiment towards GWB, noting concerns about its agricultural loan exposure, and provides a positive outlook ('Buy' rating) for IBERIABANK (IBKC), anticipating benefits from pro-growth policies under the Trump administration. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document contains snippets of a news article detailing the political maneuvering surrounding Judge Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation. It describes the White House's aggressive response to accusations, President Trump's controversial remarks, and the delicate position of Republican senators who must balance party loyalty with the concerns of moderate voters and key uncommitted senators.
This document is a digital news article snippet concerning the 2018 Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh, not Jeffrey Epstein. It details a new allegation of misconduct from a Yale classmate, Ms. Ramirez, and the lack of corroboration found by The New York Times. The text also includes reactions from Republicans, conservative activists like Carrie Severino, and statements from Kavanaugh's legal team refuting the claims.
This document is a news article, likely presented as a congressional exhibit, detailing the political response to sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It reports on Kavanaugh's planned Fox News interview to deny the claims, statements of support from Republicans like Senators Hatch and Cotton and President Trump, and the context of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations. The article also outlines the delicate political situation in the Senate, where a few key Republican votes will decide the confirmation outcome.
This document is an email exchange from August 3, 2018, between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein sends Bannon a political analysis discussing the 2018 midterms, the political climate under President Trump, and the need for a 'back-up plan' or 'chaos' candidate for 2020. Bannon replies by asking Epstein for the source of the text, indicating the analysis may not be Epstein's original writing.
This document is a political strategy memo arguing for the viability of a centrist, third-party presidential candidate in the 2020 U.S. election. Citing the 'failed' 2016 election, high disapproval of Donald Trump, and a leftward shift in the Democratic party, the author suggests the electorate is open to an alternative. The memo brainstorms several 'radical' bipartisan tickets, such as Biden/Romney and Bill Gates/Hogan, as possibilities.
This document is a one-page policy analysis from an EY report titled 'Election 2016', discussing President-elect Trump's proposed tax and energy policies. It compares his plans to the House Republican 'Blueprint' and analyzes the potential impact on the energy sector, including differing treatments for fossil fuels and renewables. The document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, finances, or activities.
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity