DOJ-OGR-00002820.jpg
569 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
569 KB
Summary
This legal document is a letter dated March 26, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who is presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution informs the court of a recent ruling in a separate case, U.S. v. Schulte, where Judge Crotty denied a motion to dismiss the indictment that was 'virtually identical' to one filed by Maxwell. The government argues that this precedent supports their position that Maxwell's motion should also be denied.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | United States District Judge |
The recipient of the letter, addressed as 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' and 'Dear Judge Nathan'. She is the judge ...
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. She filed a motion to dismiss her i...
|
| Judge Crotty | Judge |
The judge who made a recent decision in the case 'United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC)'. He denied the defendan...
|
| Schulte | Defendant |
The defendant in the case 'United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC)'. He filed a motion to dismiss his indictment o...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice | government agency |
Appears in the letterhead of the document.
|
| United States Attorney, Southern District of New York | government agency |
The sender of the letter, as indicated by the letterhead.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecution (the United States Attorney's office) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| United States District Court, Southern District of New York | court |
The court where Judge Alison J. Nathan presides and where the case against Ghislaine Maxwell is being heard.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-01-25
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a motion to dismiss the indictment in her case.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Recent to 2021-03-26
Judge Crotty rejected the claims and denied the defendant's motion to dismiss in the United States v. Schulte case.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States Attorney and the District Court mentioned in the document.
|
|
|
Part of the address for the United States Attorney's office.
|
|
|
The address of the United States Attorney's office.
|
|
|
The address of the United States District Court where Judge Nathan is located.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the location where the grand jury was sitting, which was the subject of the defendants' motions to dismiss.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states that Maxwell's motion to dismiss was 'virtually identical in multiple respects' to the one filed by Schulte, and that 'Like Maxwell, the defendant in Schulte asserted' a similar claim.
Judge Nathan is the presiding judge in the criminal case against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell.
Judge Crotty was the presiding judge who ruled on the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Schulte.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,492 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 185 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
March 26, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully writes to bring the Court’s attention to a recent decision by Judge Crotty in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (“Schulte Op.”). In that case, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on November 16, 2020 (see 17 Cr. 548 (PAC), ECF No. 435), which was virtually identical in multiple respects to the January 25, 2021 motion to dismiss the indictment filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the above-captioned case (see 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), ECF No. 126). Like Maxwell, the defendant in Schulte asserted, among other things, a claim under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, arguing that the indictment should be dismissed because the grand jury sitting in White Plains unfairly underrepresented Black and Hispanic individuals. Judge Crotty rejected those claims in their entirety and denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Judge Crotty’s thorough, well-reasoned decision supports the Government’s position in this case.
DOJ-OGR-00002820
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document