HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016570.jpg

2.25 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Meeting minutes (code enforcement board)
File Size: 2.25 MB
Summary

This document contains minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting dated July 17, 2008, specifically detailing a fine reduction hearing for Case #08-2301 involving 167 E. Inlet Drive owned by Ajax Equity LLC and The Landfall Group. Attorney Frank Lynch argued for a reduction of the $34,250 accumulated fine for construction delays, citing a lack of awareness of specific code provisions and previous board discussions. The document notes a discrepancy in dates (stating a fine started November 2008 for a meeting in July 2008, likely a typo for 2007 given the March 2008 compliance date).

People (7)

Name Role Context
Ms. Greenberg Board Member
Seconded a motion regarding a fine assessment.
Walton Lead Code Enforcement Officer
Presented the case against Ajax Equity LLC/The Landfall Group.
Frank Lynch Attorney
Representing The Landfall Group and Ajax Equity LLC; arguing for fine reduction.
Lazslo Wagner Principal
Principal of The Landfall Group; builder in Palm Beach for 26 years.
Mr. Koeppel Board Member
Made a previous motion to allow extension (failed 4-3).
Ms. Duemler Board Member
Suggested reducing the daily fine to $125.00 in a previous meeting.
Gerry Code Enforcement Officer
Stated the position to get more assertive on construction delays.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Code Enforcement Board
Governing body holding the meeting.
The Landfall Group
Respondent in fine reduction case.
Ajax Equity LLC
Respondent/Owner associated with the property violation.
Town of Palm Beach
Municipality where construction occurred.
Town Council
Suggested more assertive enforcement.

Timeline (3 events)

July 17, 2008
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
Palm Beach
Board Members Frank Lynch Officer Walton
March 2008
Final inspection obtained/compliance achieved
167 E. Inlet Drive
October 2007
Previous Board appearance/hearing regarding violation

Locations (1)

Location Context
Property subject to code violation case # 08-2301.

Relationships (2)

Frank Lynch Attorney/Client The Landfall Group
Frank Lynch advised he was the attorney for both The Landfall Group and Ajax.
Lazslo Wagner Principal/Business The Landfall Group
Lazslo Wagner, the principal of The Landfall Group

Key Quotes (3)

"This was not someone’s house, it was a speculative venture."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016570.jpg
Quote #1
"The fine ran for 137 days prior to compliance being achieved and the accumulated fine due is $34,250.00"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016570.jpg
Quote #2
"Lazslo Wagner... acknowledged he was unaware of this particular code provision."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016570.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,829 characters)

Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes 07/17/08
ASSESS A FINE OF $250.00, RETROACTIVE TO JULY 17, 2008 IF COMPLIANCE WAS NOT ACHIEVED
SECONDED BY MS. GREENBERG
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
VIII. Fine Reduction:
A. Case # 08-2301, 167 E. Inlet Drive, The Landfall Group
Violation of Chapter 18, Section 18-242, Subsection 104.5.1.6, medium projects, all new or remodel construction projects 4000 sq. ft, to 8,999 sq. ft. under roof be allowed 22 months
Lead Code Enforcement Officer Walton said in October, 2007, Ajax Equity LLC was found in violation of going over the construction time limits. On November 15, 2008 they still were not in compliance and a daily fine of $250.00 started running. The final inspection was obtained in March, 2008. The fine ran for 137 days prior to compliance being achieved and the accumulated fine due is $34,250.00 and the $150.00 hearing costs have not been paid.
Frank Lynch advised he was the attorney for both The Landfall Group and Ajax. He said when they appeared before the Board in October, Lazslo Wagner, the principal of The Landfall Group, who has built homes throughout the Town of Palm Beach for 26 years acknowledged he was unaware of this particular code provision. Had he been, they would have applied for an extension of time to complete the construction. At the hearing, Mr. Koeppel made a motion to allow them an additional sixty (60) days to complete the construction, find them in non-compliance and assess the $150 costs. After a significant amount of discussion, that motion went to a vote and failed 4-3. A second motion was made and Ms. Duemler thought the $250.00 fee was significant and believed the fine should be $125.00 a day. Mr. Lynch gave Mr. Walton a copy of that transcript to put in the record. As part of their request, they are asking the Board to consider what Ms. Duemler suggested at the meeting. At the same time, Mr. Lynch said he would like them to consider that The Landfall Group is a good corporate citizen and made a legitimate mistake. As a result, a fine was incurred and they are willing to accept some level of fine, some level of responsibility for what they did. The construction was continually on going, there were no delays other than the construction process itself. This was not someone’s house, it was a speculative venture. There had been some concerns with the shell contractor and the finish items themselves were significant enough that there were substantial delays. At that same hearing, Code Enforcement Officer Gerry said it was the position of Code Enforcement to get more assertive at the suggestion of Town Council and that these projects were to be more aggressively pursued. Under the new ordinance, for a house of approximately 5,000 sq. feet, they would be entitled to 24 months. This would
17
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016570

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document