| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
OUP
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LLC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-07-17 | N/A | Code Enforcement Board Meeting to discuss fine reduction for Case # 08-2301. | Town of Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-04-17 | N/A | Code Enforcement Board Meeting | Town of Palm Beach | View |
This document contains minutes from a Palm Beach Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008. It details a fine reduction hearing for Case #08-2301 involving the property at 167 E. Inlet Drive, owned by Ajax Equity LLC (a known Jeffrey Epstein entity). The property faced over $34,000 in fines for construction delays described as a 'speculative venture,' with attorney Frank Lynch representing both Ajax and the contractor, The Landfall Group.
Meeting minutes from the Code Enforcement Board dated July 17, 2008. The document details a fine reduction hearing for Case # 08-2301 regarding property at 167 E. Inlet Drive, owned/managed by The Landfall Group and Ajax Equity LLC. Attorney Frank Lynch represented the entities, arguing for a reduction of the $34,250 accumulated fine for construction delays.
This document contains minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting dated July 17, 2008, specifically detailing a fine reduction hearing for Case #08-2301 involving 167 E. Inlet Drive owned by Ajax Equity LLC and The Landfall Group. Attorney Frank Lynch argued for a reduction of the $34,250 accumulated fine for construction delays, citing a lack of awareness of specific code provisions and previous board discussions. The document notes a discrepancy in dates (stating a fine started November 2008 for a meeting in July 2008, likely a typo for 2007 given the March 2008 compliance date).
Lynch gave Walton a copy of a transcript from a previous hearing to put in the record.
Argument for fine reduction based on lack of awareness of code provision and good corporate standing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity