Disneyland
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000565.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning bail conditions for Mr. Epstein. His attorney, Mr. Weinberg, argues that Epstein is not a flight risk, contrasting him with another defendant who lied to pretrial services. Weinberg proposes an additional condition of a credible trustee living in Epstein's home to ensure compliance, in an attempt to persuade the judge to reconsider the detention order.
DOJ-OGR-00017090.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that the testimony of the defense's expert on memory, Professor Loftus, is irrelevant to the case, which concerns traumatic memories of sexual abuse. Ms. Moe attempts to discredit Loftus by highlighting her career as a paid witness for criminal defendants and contrasting her academic experiments (e.g., Bugs Bunny at Disneyland) with the serious nature of the alleged crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00016656.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus. The questioning focuses on a psychological study Loftus conducted, which successfully implanted false memories in participants by suggesting they had met the Warner Brothers character Bugs Bunny at Disneyland. The transcript concludes with an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, objecting to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00014469.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues against the credibility and relevance of the defense's expert witness, Professor Loftus, who specializes in memory. She contrasts Loftus's academic experiments on malleable memory with the powerful, traumatic memories of sexual abuse victims, portraying Loftus as a biased, paid advocate for the defense whose testimony is a distraction from the actual facts of the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity