DOJ-OGR-00001091.jpg

649 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 649 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against granting bail to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The prosecution contends that she possesses significant financial resources, has demonstrated sophistication in hiding herself and her assets, and has an extraordinary capacity to evade detection, as evidenced by her behavior after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. The document concludes that even a bail package with electronic monitoring would be insufficient to prevent her from fleeing.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the document, which argues for her detention due to her financial resources, sophistication in hiding,...
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned in the context that after his arrest, Ms. Maxwell retreated from view and began hiding.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
court government agency
Mentioned throughout as the body that must be assured of the defendant's appearance and which does not share the defe...
government government agency
Mentioned as the entity the defense claims Ms. Maxwell was not trying to hide from.
press media
Mentioned as a group from which Ms. Maxwell was allegedly trying to hide to avoid scrutiny.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (2 events)

After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, Ms. Maxwell retreated from view, moved to New England, and changed locations multiple times to evade detection.
New England
The arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, which precipitated Ms. Maxwell's decision to retreat from view.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location Ms. Maxwell moved to after the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell associate Jeffrey Epstein
The document states that Ms. Maxwell's actions of retreating from view and hiding began "After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein," indicating a significant connection between them.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,585 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page150 of 200
87
k7e2MaxC kjc
the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to
set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her
appearance in court.
Even if the picture of her financial resources were
not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.
Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial
resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those
resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,
Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,
changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have
made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense
said that she did all of this not to hide from the government
but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press
scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide
from the press and public, an assumption that the court does
not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent
conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade
detection, even in the face of what the defense has
acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.
Because of these concerns, even a bail package with
electronic monitoring and home security guards would be
insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply
remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have
observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not
prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001091

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document