DOJ-OGR-00013145.jpg
417 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
417 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a sidebar conversation between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey and the judge regarding the scope of a prior consistent statement being offered during the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. They agree to expand the portion of the statement being read to provide proper context, clarifying the specific starting and ending line numbers.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAGLIUCA | Mr. |
An attorney speaking during a sidebar discussion in court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the court proceeding, speaking during a sidebar.
|
| COMEY | Ms. |
An attorney speaking during a sidebar discussion in court, addressed as 'your Honor' by her.
|
| Carolyn | Witness (likely) |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of the 'direct' examination.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (3)
MR. PAGLIUCA
→
Professional (adversarial)
→
MS. COMEY
They are opposing counsel in a court case, negotiating an evidentiary issue before the judge.
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney making an argument to the presiding judge (THE COURT).
Ms. Comey is an attorney interacting with the presiding judge (THE COURT) and addresses the judge as 'your Honor'.
Key Quotes (2)
"The problem is, when read in context, which really starts at line 20 on the page above and goes through probably line 16 on the next page, we're simply just parsing out two lines."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing against offering a statement without sufficient context.)
DOJ-OGR-00013145.jpg
Quote #1
"She can read the whole thing."Source
— THE COURT
(Ruling on Mr. Pagliuca's objection about the scope of the statement.)
DOJ-OGR-00013145.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (920 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 132 of 264 1558
LC7Cmax4 Carolyn - direct
LC7Cmax4 Carolyn - direct
1 (At the sidebar)
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: This is apparently being offered as
3 purported prior consistent statement?
4 THE COURT: Right.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem is, when read in context,
6 which really starts at line 20 on the page above and goes
7 through probably line 16 on the next page, we're simply just
8 parsing out two lines.
9 THE COURT: She can read the whole thing.
10 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Okay?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.
13 MS. COMEY: Starting at which line?
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'd say 136, line 23.
15 MS. COMEY: That's an answer.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: So the question is going to be line 20.
17 MS. COMEY: Line 20 through line 6.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013145
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document