Comey
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Drescher
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court break | The court calls for a mid-afternoon break of about 15 minutes. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Recess | A recess is taken during the court proceedings. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding the contents... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of Juan Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Court appearance/hearing | Court | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Cross-Examination in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00009834.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between defense attorney Joe Nascimento and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding a client connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails discuss scheduling meetings, proffers, and interviews, as well as confirming representation after the passing of the client's previous attorney, Alan Ross.
DOJ-OGR-00018332.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. In it, the judge dismisses a witness, Mr. Dawson, for the weekend, stipulating that he may only have logistical contact with the government as he is still under cross-examination. The judge and counsel then discuss and set a filing schedule for briefs related to the next witness, Maguire, who is scheduled to testify the following Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00018252.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding from August 10, 2022, specifically the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. An attorney, Ms. Comey, questions Parkinson about the contents of several government exhibits (235, 236, 228, 231), which depict various interior views of a property, including a 'lake room', 'foyer', and 'garden room'. Ms. Comey directs a Ms. Drescher to display the exhibits during the testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00018177.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the moment a recess is called. The judge dismisses the witness, Mr. Alessi, from the stand and addresses a logistical request from Ms. Williams for A/V personnel to meet with the government. After confirming with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca that there are no other matters, the judge announces a ten-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018083.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The testimony concerns a communal message pad kept on a kitchen desk. Following the testimony, an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the admission of certain messages as evidence, arguing they are hearsay while conceding that messages in Mr. Alessi's or his wife's handwriting have been authenticated.
DOJ-OGR-00018050.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a book, which he identifies as a later, thinner version of a previous one, and notes that his name, which was listed in connection with a house in Palm Beach, is absent. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning but is overruled by the court before the proceedings turn to a sealed government exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00018047.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey presents Government Exhibit 52, which Mr. Alessi identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms he had reviewed the directory the previous night.
DOJ-OGR-00017984.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of a direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning concerns the layout of a house using Government Exhibit 298 but is quickly paused due to technical issues with a touch screen and the judge's decision to call a recess for the jurors' lunch.
DOJ-OGR-00008329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2021. The judge and attorneys discuss procedural matters for an upcoming trial, agreeing to resolve a hearsay/relevance issue during the trial itself. The court then raises the issue of whether individuals disclosed by the defense, specifically Kelso and Lopez, should be considered fact witnesses rather than expert witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00008317.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey regarding pre-trial motions. The judge rules that an attorney cannot be called as a witness without prior briefing, and the parties discuss the timing and content of jury instructions for witnesses who will be testifying under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00000825.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 19-2221, detailing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein between July 16 and July 23, 2019. Key events include the filing of letters by Epstein's attorneys regarding bail, the appearance of several new attorneys, a bond hearing on July 18 where bail was denied by Judge Richard M. Berman, and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by Epstein. The document lists all parties present at the hearing, including prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law enforcement agents.
DOJ-OGR-00000824.jpg
This document contains docket entries for Case 19-2221 (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein) from July 15-16, 2019. It records court appearances by Epstein, his defense team (Weinberg, Weingarten, Fernich, etc.), and government representatives (Comey, FBI Agent Young, NYPD Detective Byrne). Key events include the scheduling of a bail hearing ruling for July 18, 2019, the granting of a speedy trial time exclusion, the filing of transcripts from a July 8 conference, and the admission of Martin Weinberg as counsel Pro Hac Vice.
DOJ-OGR-00000783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 16-23, 2019, detailing the proceedings of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221). It documents the denial of Epstein's bail during a hearing on July 18, 2019, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, attended by FBI and NYPD representatives. Following the remand order, Epstein's defense team filed a Notice of Appeal on July 22, 2019, along with a sealed document placed in the vault.
DOJ-OGR-00019060.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a moment during a trial where the judge calls for a mid-afternoon break. The cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Everdell is paused, and the jury and witness are dismissed. The attorneys for the government (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Everdell) confirm they have no immediate matters to discuss, with Mr. Everdell noting he is less than halfway through his questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00018912.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal objection made by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, under Rule 404(b) during the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, counters that the testimony is "Direct evidence," prompting the judge to intervene.
DOJ-OGR-00018848.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on the witness's claim that she previously saw a photograph of a nude and pregnant Ms. Maxwell in Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00017019.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and several attorneys regarding the logistics for closing arguments. The conversation focuses on procedures for handling redacted exhibits and presenting sealed video evidence exclusively to the jury, not on public screens. The judge also issues a directive that counsel must not orally refer to the real names of witnesses who testified under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00016792.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the redirect examination of Special Agent Richards by attorney Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on the accuracy of the agent's interview notes. After the examination concludes, the Court excuses Special Agent Richards, and defense counsel Ms. Menninger calls the next witness, Agent Amanda Young.
DOJ-OGR-00016788.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Richards. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions the witness about a document they reviewed and initialed, which was prepared by Special Agent Kuyrkendall. The witness confirms their initials and that the document was accurate at the time, but notes that the interview in question took place 14 years ago.
DOJ-OGR-00013145.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a sidebar conversation between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey and the judge regarding the scope of a prior consistent statement being offered during the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. They agree to expand the portion of the statement being read to provide proper context, clarifying the specific starting and ending line numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.
DOJ-OGR-00013476.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge calls for a mid-afternoon break during the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. After a recess, Mr. Everdell informs the court that he is not yet halfway through his questioning, indicating the examination will continue for some time.
DOJ-OGR-00013328.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a brief exchange where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to a question posed to a witness named Shawn, citing Rule 404(b). Another attorney, Ms. Comey, counters the objection, and the judge interjects to manage the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00011752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Visoski identifies a photograph, marked as Government Exhibit 202, as the garage of Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach. Following his testimony and no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a witness's, Mr. Visoski's, testimony, where he is excused by the judge. Following his departure, the counsel for the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the government (Ms. Comey) have a brief procedural exchange with the judge before the government is invited to call its next witness.
Jury instruction regarding witness testimony
A discussion between the judge and two attorneys (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey) about whether to give the jury a limiting instruction regarding the testimony of a witness named Annie, and how that testimony applies to different counts in an indictment.
Admissibility of new arguments post-testimony
A discussion between the judge and attorneys about whether a new issue can be raised that was not brought up during a witness examination. The judge explains their reasoning for not admitting something following Mr. Alessi's testimony and states they remain open to arguments.
Procedural matters in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
A discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding the status of witnesses, a potential government rebuttal expert, and an affidavit from Mr. Hamilton.
Carolyn's introduction to Virginia and Jeffrey Epstein
This is a transcript of a direct examination where a witness named Carolyn is questioned about her relationship with Virginia, whom she met at age 14. The questioning covers their social group and activities, and how Virginia first approached Carolyn with an opportunity to make money, which is linked to the first mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
Responsiveness of testimony to a jury note
Attorneys Pagliuca and Comey debate whether Special Agent Jason Richards' testimony should be added to the court's response to a jury note concerning the cross-examination of Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request.
Direct examination of Mr. Rodgers regarding passenger 'Jane'
An attorney questions witness Mr. Rodgers about his first meeting with a passenger named 'Jane' on November 11, 1996, who she flew with (Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell), and the number of times he saw her on Epstein's planes. The questioning then directs the witness to Government Exhibit 662.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter regarding proposed redactions to a letter briefing.
Response in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell
Response regarding Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion dated August 17, 2020.
Opposition to Dkt 43
Government opposition to defense motion.
Opposition to Letter Motion re: Exceeding Page Limit
A letter response in opposition to Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's letter motion of August 17, 2020.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter regarding proposed redactions in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020.
Opposition to Letter Motion re: Request for Permission to...
A letter response in opposition to the motion filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on 08/17/2020.
Proposed redactions to letter briefing
A letter from the USA regarding proposed redactions to a letter briefing.
Opposition to Letter Motion 43
A letter response in opposition to Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's letter motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity