DOJ-OGR-00002100.jpg

908 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 908 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, details the procedural steps of an extradition hearing in the United Kingdom. It explains the specific legal questions a judge must resolve, including technical compliance and human rights compatibility, before a case can proceed. If the judge approves the extradition request, the case is then sent to the Secretary of State, who must consider a different set of potential bars before issuing a final extradition order.

People (2)

Name Role Context
judge judge
Mentioned as the decision-maker in an extradition hearing who must decide on technical requirements, human rights com...
Secretary of State Secretary of State
The government official who receives an extradition case from a judge and must decide whether a separate set of bars ...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
International Criminal Court court
Mentioned in a footnote as a body from which an earlier transfer to the UK would constitute a bar to extradition for ...

Timeline (2 events)

An extradition hearing where a judge must decide on multiple factors, including technical requirements, the identity of the person, whether the offenses qualify, bars to extradition, and compatibility with human rights.
court
judge person whose extradition is requested
A review of an extradition case by the Secretary of State, following a judge's decision, to determine if specific bars (such as the death penalty or speciality) apply before ordering the extradition.

Locations (2)

Location Context
US
Mentioned in the context of 'US extradition cases', which have a 65-day time limit for serving a full request after a...
Mentioned in footnotes as the jurisdiction where the ECHR applies and as a location to which prior extradition or tra...

Relationships (1)

judge professional Secretary of State
The document outlines a sequential legal process where the judge first decides on statutory questions in an extradition case and, if those are satisfied, must then send the case to the Secretary of State for a separate and final determination.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,282 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 5 of 29
who must consider, amongst other things, whether to remand the person in custody or on bail¹⁴. In cases where the person appears before the court pursuant to a full extradition request, the judge must set a date for the extradition hearing to begin¹⁵. In provisional arrest cases, this date is set after the full request is served which, in US extradition cases, must be within 65 days of arrest¹⁶.
7. At the extradition hearing, the appropriate judge must decide: (a) whether the extradition request meets certain technical requirements¹⁷; (b) whether the person appearing before the judge is the person whose extradition is requested¹⁸; (c) whether the offence(s) specified in the extradition request are extradition offence(s)¹⁹; (d) whether there are any bars to extradition²⁰; (e) whether extradition would be compatible with the person’s rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’) within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998²¹; and, where applicable, (f) whether extradition would be oppressive by reason of the person’s mental or physical condition²².
8. If the appropriate judge decides all the statutory questions in favour of the requesting government, then they must send the case to the Secretary of State²³ who must decide whether any of the bars to extradition that she must consider²⁴ apply. These bars are different to those considered by the appropriate judge. The Secretary of State has no power to consider any human rights objections to extradition²⁵. If she decides that no bars apply, she must order the person’s extradition,²⁶ subject to very limited exceptions which are not applicable here²⁷.
¹⁴ Extradition Act 2003, ss. 72(7)(c) and 74(7)(c).
¹⁵ Extradition Act 2003, s. 75.
¹⁶ Extradition Act 2003, s. 74(11)(b) and Extradition Act 2003 (Designation of Part 2 Territories) Order 2003/3334, Art. 4.
¹⁷ Extradition Act 2003, s. 78(2). The request must contain: (a) the documents specified in s. 70(9) (the extradition request and the Secretary of State’s certificate); (b) particulars of the offence(s) specified in the request; (c) an arrest warrant or a certificate of conviction and, where applicable, sentence. The judge must also decide whether the relevant documentation has been served on the requested person: s. 87(4)(c).
¹⁸ Extradition Act 2003, s. 78(4)(a).
¹⁹ Extradition Act 2003, s. 78(4)(b).
²⁰ The bars to extradition are: (a) the rule against double jeopardy (s. 80); (b) extraneous considerations (s. 81); (c) passage of time (s. 82); (d) hostage-taking considerations (s. 83); and (e) forum (s. 83A). The bars to extradition are considered further at paras. 26 to 35 below.
²¹ Section 87. The rights under the ECHR apply to every person within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom: ECHR, Art. 1.
²² Extradition Act 2003, s. 91.
²³ Extradition Act 2003, s. 87(3).
²⁴ The bars to extradition that the Secretary of State must consider are: (a) the death penalty (s. 94); (b) speciality (s. 95); (c) earlier extradition to the United Kingdom from another territory (s. 96); and (d) earlier transfer to the United Kingdom from the International Criminal Court (s. 96A).
²⁵ Extradition Act 2003, s. 70(11).
1922623.1
4
DOJ-OGR-00002100

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document