This legal document analyzes the potential bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell from the UK to the US. It argues that bars related to oppression or human rights (Article 8 of the ECHR) are unlikely to be available to her, especially given that she absconded from the United States. The document also clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 is not discretionary but is limited to specific statutory grounds.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit 103-2) dated December 23, 2020, analyzing UK extradition law in relation to Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that if Maxwell were to flee the US to the UK, she would likely be denied bail and her arguments against extradition (oppression, human rights) would fail due to 'bad faith' and the serious nature of the charges. It also clarifies the limited powers of the UK Secretary of State to refuse extradition under the Extradition Act 2003.
This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from December 23, 2020, argues against the availability of certain bars to the extradition of Ms. Maxwell. It posits that a finding of oppression is unlikely given she absconded from the United States, and that human rights claims under the ECHR are also improbable. The document further clarifies that the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition is strictly limited by the Extradition Act 2003 and is not a matter of general discretion.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, details the procedural steps of an extradition hearing in the United Kingdom. It explains the specific legal questions a judge must resolve, including technical compliance and human rights compatibility, before a case can proceed. If the judge approves the extradition request, the case is then sent to the Secretary of State, who must consider a different set of potential bars before issuing a final extradition order.
This document appears to be page 12 of a transcript from an interview with a Palestinian official. The text focuses entirely on geopolitical strategy regarding the United Nations, specifically the pursuit of statehood or upgraded status in the General Assembly if the U.S. vetoes a bid in the Security Council. It mentions potential repercussions for Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, referencing international law (Hague and Geneva Conventions). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer.
A Los Angeles Times article from September 6, 2011, detailing an interview with Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat regarding the Palestinian Authority's bid for UN statehood. The article outlines the political tension involving the US, Israel, and the UN Security Council, and notes the arrival of White House envoys David Hale and Dennis Ross in the region to pressure against the bid. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity