DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg

615 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 615 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and government counsel (Ms. Moe). The core issue is the admissibility of a deposition from Ms. Maxwell, which the government wishes to use to rebut a 'last minute' issue raised by the defense concerning Kinnerton Street property records. The defense offers to stipulate to the property records to avoid the deposition being entered and to negate the need for an additional witness.

People (4)

Name Role Context
MR. EVERDELL Defense Counsel (implied)
Speaker in the transcript, representing the defense, arguing about the admission of a deposition and witness testimony.
MS. MOE Government Counsel (implied)
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government, arguing for the admission of a deposition to rebut a defense ...
Ms. Maxwell Deponent
Her deposition is the subject of the legal argument between the counsels.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the legal argument.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
the government government agency
A party in the legal case, represented by Ms. Moe.
the defense legal team
A party in the legal case, represented by Mr. Everdell.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
A legal argument regarding the admission of Ms. Maxwell's deposition as rebuttal evidence concerning Kinnerton Street property records.
Courtroom
The defense produced the Kinnerton Street records to the government on a Friday evening.
The government produced the deposition of Ms. Maxwell the day after receiving the Kinnerton Street records.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in relation to property records produced by the defense.

Relationships (1)

MR. EVERDELL professional/adversarial MS. MOE
They represent opposing sides ('the defense' and 'the government') in a legal argument before 'THE COURT' regarding the admission of evidence.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, on Friday evening, the defense produced the Kinnerton Street records to the government. The next day, we produced the deposition in which Ms. Maxwell made that statement."
Source
— MS. MOE (Explaining the timeline and justification for introducing Ms. Maxwell's deposition.)
DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, if the government is willing to stip to just putting in the property records showing the title ownership without the deposition transcript, we're willing to do that, we won't need the extra witness."
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Offering a stipulation to avoid the admission of the deposition transcript and the need for an additional witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg
Quote #2
"it's only being offered to rebut this last minute registry issue... it's only because the defense is putting this at issue."
Source
— MS. MOE (Arguing that the deposition is necessary only because of an issue raised by the defense at a late stage.)
DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,594 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 164 of 197 2705
LCHCmax5
1 MR. EVERDELL: I can't remember when the government
2 produced the depo to us.
3 MS. MOE: Your Honor, on Friday evening, the defense
4 produced the Kinnerton Street records to the government. The
5 next day, we produced the deposition in which Ms. Maxwell made
6 that statement. Of course, it's Ms. Maxwell's own deposition
7 and it's also a public record.
8 THE COURT: Right. I mean, it comes in. I don't see
9 any basis it doesn't come in. The question is --
10 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the deposition,
11 just so the record is clear, it's only being offered to rebut
12 this last minute registry issue. There is no -- to the extent
13 defense counsel is arguing they need to call this witness to
14 rebut an inference from the government, I want to be clear it's
15 only because the defense is putting this at issue. We would be
16 happy to just rest here and not make this an issue at all. The
17 reason that there is a purported need for this is, again,
18 because the defense is inviting this issue at this late hour.
19 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if the government is
20 willing to stip to just putting in the property records showing
21 the title ownership without the deposition transcript, we're
22 willing to do that, we won't need the extra witness. If
23 they're going to put in the deposition transcript and make that
24 an issue, we feel like we need the other witness to be able to
25 counter that.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016893

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document