This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and government counsel (Ms. Moe). The core issue is the admissibility of a deposition from Ms. Maxwell, which the government wishes to use to rebut a 'last minute' issue raised by the defense concerning Kinnerton Street property records. The defense offers to stipulate to the property records to avoid the deposition being entered and to negate the need for an additional witness.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Defense Counsel (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, representing the defense, arguing about the admission of a deposition and witness testimony.
|
| MS. MOE | Government Counsel (implied) |
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government, arguing for the admission of a deposition to rebut a defense ...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Deponent |
Her deposition is the subject of the legal argument between the counsels.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the legal argument.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, represented by Ms. Moe.
|
| the defense | legal team |
A party in the legal case, represented by Mr. Everdell.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to property records produced by the defense.
|
"Your Honor, on Friday evening, the defense produced the Kinnerton Street records to the government. The next day, we produced the deposition in which Ms. Maxwell made that statement."Source
"Your Honor, if the government is willing to stip to just putting in the property records showing the title ownership without the deposition transcript, we're willing to do that, we won't need the extra witness."Source
"it's only being offered to rebut this last minute registry issue... it's only because the defense is putting this at issue."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,594 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document