Kinnerton Street

Location
Mentions
15
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
7
Also known as:
Kinnerton Street property

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00021069.jpg

This legal document summarizes testimony from two witnesses, Kate and Annie Farmer, regarding their interactions with Maxwell and Epstein. Kate testified that Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, leading to sexual activity during massages, while Annie Farmer testified about being introduced to Epstein by her sister, being inappropriately touched by him, and later receiving a massage from Maxwell. The document concludes by noting a jury instruction that the physical contact described was not considered “illegal sexual activity” in the context of the indictment.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018430.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Kate. She confirms meeting Jeffrey Epstein near Nags Pub on Kinnerton Street and discusses her relationship with a 'prominent older gentleman' who introduced her to Ghislaine Maxwell and took her to Paris. The testimony also covers her marriage to a restaurateur.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018429.jpg

This document is page 92 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on Kate's history of 'periodic drug abuse' (cocaine, alcohol, sleeping pills) and her sobriety. It establishes that Kate met Ghislaine Maxwell at a home with a red door on Kinnerton Street around 1994, when Kate was approximately 17 years old.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018411.jpg

This document is page 74 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The testimony establishes that Kate grew up in the wealthy Belgravia section of London, very close to 44 Kinnerton Street, where Ghislaine Maxwell lived. The questioning also touches on Kate's mother's beauty and the attention she received.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016893.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) and government counsel (Ms. Moe). The core issue is the admissibility of a deposition from Ms. Maxwell, which the government wishes to use to rebut a 'last minute' issue raised by the defense concerning Kinnerton Street property records. The defense offers to stipulate to the property records to avoid the deposition being entered and to negate the need for an additional witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016739.jpg

This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, discusses an upcoming witness from the U.K. and a declaration provided by an unnamed witness. This witness, who owns the Nags Head Pub, has direct knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's ownership and residency at a Kinnerton Street property, having observed her presence there daily and noting her occupancy timeline. The document also includes a brief comment from MS. COMEY regarding the defense's preparation time.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016497.jpg

This document is page 14 of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, related to the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The dialogue is between the Court and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Ms. Maxwell's residency in London. Everdell argues that title records showing Maxwell owned a property at 69 Stanhope Mews prior to purchasing a residence on Kinnerton Street would prove she was not living at the new location earlier than claimed, while the Court questions why a proffered attorney witness is not present to testify to these facts.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity