DOJ-OGR-00013840.jpg
564 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
564 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a scheduling discussion between the judge and various counsel. The defense, represented by Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Sternheim, estimates their case will take two to three days and suggests using an available Saturday to proceed. All parties, including Ms. Moe and the Court, agree to this proposal.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAGLIUCA | Counsel (likely for the defense) |
Speaker, identified as MR. PAGLIUCA, who estimates the length of the defense's case.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker, referred to as THE COURT and 'your Honor', who is presiding over the case and discussing scheduling.
|
| MOE | Counsel |
Speaker, identified as MS. MOE, who discusses the timing of the charge conference with the court.
|
| Sternheim | Counsel (likely for the defense) |
Speaker, identified as Ms. Sternheim, who suggests utilizing a Saturday for the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (4)
Mr. Pagliuca, as counsel, addresses the judge ('your Honor') to provide an estimate on the length of the defense case.
Ms. Moe, as counsel, addresses the judge ('your Honor') regarding scheduling discussions.
Ms. Sternheim, as counsel, addresses the judge to make a scheduling suggestion.
MS. MOE
→
professional
→
MR. PAGLIUCA
Ms. Moe states, 'We haven't conferred with the defense about that,' indicating they are opposing counsel discussing case logistics.
Key Quotes (3)
"I would say -- I'm going to guess no more than four days, more likely two to three, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Estimating the length of the defense's case in response to a question from the Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00013840.jpg
Quote #1
"I was just going to suggest that we utilize the Saturday that the Court said would be available."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Proposing a scheduling solution to the Court to keep the trial moving forward.)
DOJ-OGR-00013840.jpg
Quote #2
"No objection to that, your Honor."Source
— MS. MOE
(Agreeing to Ms. Sternheim's suggestion to use a Saturday for court proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00013840.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,666 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 249 of 267 2277
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 you're in a position at this point to make those disclosures as
2 if it is that person, so I did expect a full disclosure.
3 What is the defense's anticipation as to length of
4 case?
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: I would say -- I'm going to guess no
6 more than four days, more likely two to three, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. All right.
8 So I think then -- and then we should talk about the
9 timing of the charge conference. Have you discussed that
10 further? You kept promising to discuss it.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 We haven't conferred with the defense about that. We
13 continue to just defer to the Court's preference on timing.
14 I think if the defense case is two to three days, then
15 a charge conference at the conclusion of that would fit with
16 the Court's timing. We're also happy to do that earlier. We
17 don't have a preference as to the sequencing there.
18 THE COURT: Let me just look at the calendar.
19 Go ahead, Ms. Sternheim.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: I was just going to suggest that we
21 utilize the Saturday that the Court said would be available.
22 Even if we had more of a case, I think we could accomplish
23 that, if the Court is still amenable.
24 THE COURT: Okay. That's fine with me.
25 MS. MOE: No objection to that, your Honor.
2 if it is that person, so I did expect a full disclosure.
3 What is the defense's anticipation as to length of
4 case?
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: I would say -- I'm going to guess no
6 more than four days, more likely two to three, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Okay. All right.
8 So I think then -- and then we should talk about the
9 timing of the charge conference. Have you discussed that
10 further? You kept promising to discuss it.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 We haven't conferred with the defense about that. We
13 continue to just defer to the Court's preference on timing.
14 I think if the defense case is two to three days, then
15 a charge conference at the conclusion of that would fit with
16 the Court's timing. We're also happy to do that earlier. We
17 don't have a preference as to the sequencing there.
18 THE COURT: Let me just look at the calendar.
19 Go ahead, Ms. Sternheim.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: I was just going to suggest that we
21 utilize the Saturday that the Court said would be available.
22 Even if we had more of a case, I think we could accomplish
23 that, if the Court is still amenable.
24 THE COURT: Okay. That's fine with me.
25 MS. MOE: No objection to that, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013840
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document