Sternheim

Person
Mentions
20
Relationships
1
Events
4
Documents
9
Also known as:
Bob Sternheim

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person ROHRBACH
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Testimony Sternheim testified during the court proceedings. Southern District View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Direct examination of witness Mr. Besselsen by attorney Mr. Rohrbach, involving the presentation ... Courtroom (implied) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court testimony/proceedings in US v. Daugerdas Southern District Court View
0022-08-10 N/A Direct examination of witness Besselsen regarding camper files and record keeping. Courtroom View

EFTA00024907.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the court regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. In an internal forward, a USANYS (prosecution) staff member notes that the defense has 'conceded' on the issue, prompting a colleague to reply 'Nice work!'.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00018224.pdf

This document is a chronology of events occurring at the MCC between July 2019 and January 2020, focusing on Jeffrey Epstein (JE) and his cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione (NT). It details the July 23 incident where Epstein was found unresponsive, the subsequent discovery of a 'note' by Tartaglione in a book, and the legal team's handling of that evidence leading up to and following Epstein's death on August 10. The timeline tracks the chain of custody for the note, internal disagreements among counsel regarding its authenticity, and media interactions by attorney Bruce Barket (BB).

Chronology / legal timeline
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00017864.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Besselsen, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. During the testimony, Mr. Rohrbach directs the witness and the jury to review two pieces of evidence, Government Exhibit 743 and Defense Exhibit J-4, with no objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Sternheim.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014882.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018879.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a legal debate between attorneys Rohrbach and Sternheim before a judge regarding the admissibility of an insurance form containing a statement by a 'Mr. Roberts'. The discussion centers on whether the act of providing insurance and paying medical bills through Mar-a-Lago constitutes a course of conduct, and whether a witness can be questioned about practices that occurred before their time of involvement.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017019.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and several attorneys regarding the logistics for closing arguments. The conversation focuses on procedures for handling redacted exhibits and presenting sealed video evidence exclusively to the jury, not on public screens. The judge also issues a directive that counsel must not orally refer to the real names of witnesses who testified under pseudonyms.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013840.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a scheduling discussion between the judge and various counsel. The defense, represented by Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Sternheim, estimates their case will take two to three days and suggests using an available Saturday to proceed. All parties, including Ms. Moe and the Court, agree to this proposal.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009978.jpg

This document is a page from a 'Min-U-Script' word index (concordance) for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The index lists words starting with 'S' through 'T', including names such as Sternheim (who testified), Stetler, Susan, Swan, Swann, and Sweeney, along with their frequency and line references in the transcript. The document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp, indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release, potentially related to the Epstein/Maxwell document productions where this case may have been cited or included.

Court transcript word index (min-u-script)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009299.jpg

This document is page A-5695, an index from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the criminal case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The index, prepared by Southern District Reporters, lists keywords starting with 'S' and their corresponding page and line numbers, with numerous references to an individual named Sternheim, who is noted to have testified.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity