HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg

972 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript
File Size: 972 KB
Summary

This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.

People (5)

Name Role Context
MR. LEOPOLD Attorney/Questioner
Questioning the witness, instructing them to provide a 'yes or no' answer.
MR. TEIN Attorney/Questioner
Questioning the witness about their knowledge of being served with a subpoena.
THE WITNESS Deponent
An unnamed individual being questioned under oath about wearing someone else's name tag on a day they were to be serv...
Unnamed female Subject
The person whose name tag the witness was wearing.
Unnamed counsel Attorney
The witness's counsel, who is mentioned as having stopped the witness from explaining an answer.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight
Mentioned in the document footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444), suggesting this document is part of records held by a Hous...

Timeline (2 events)

Undisclosed
The witness wore another person's name tag. This coincided with a day the witness was going to be served with a subpoena.
Undisclosed
THE WITNESS Unnamed female whose name tag was used
Undisclosed
Process servers were looking for the witness to serve a subpoena.
Undisclosed
Process servers THE WITNESS

Relationships (4)

MR. LEOPOLD Attorney-Deponent THE WITNESS
MR. LEOPOLD is questioning THE WITNESS in a formal deposition.
MR. TEIN Attorney-Deponent THE WITNESS
MR. TEIN is questioning THE WITNESS in a formal deposition.
THE WITNESS Switched name tags Unnamed female
The transcript states the witness was wearing 'her name tag'.
THE WITNESS Client-Attorney Unnamed counsel
Mr. Tein states, 'Now you can explain the answer that your counsel stopped you from explaining.'

Key Quotes (3)

"Q. Your testimony under oath is that's just a coincidence, right? A. Total honesty."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. It just happens to be the day that you were going to be served with a subpoena, correct? ... THE WITNESS: Yes."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
Quote #2
"Q. You knew before the day that you switched name tags with [REDACTED] that the process servers were looking for you, didn't you? ... THE WITNESS: Okay. No."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,022 characters)

~0929104.TXT
5 coincidence, was wearing your name tag?
6 A. Yes, sir.
7 Q. And just by coincidence, you were wearing
8 her name tag, correct?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. Your testimony under oath is that's just a
11 coincidence, right?
12 A. Total honesty.
13 Q. It just happens to be the day that you were
14 going to be served with a subpoena, correct?
15 A. That wasn't the first day that --
16 MR. LEOPOLD: [REDACTED] just answer the
17 question. It calls for a yes or no.
18 THE WITNESS: Yes.
19 BY MR. TEIN:
20 Q. You said that wasn't the first day you were
21 going to be -- you thought you were being served with a
22 subpoena, correct?
23 A. Correct.
24 Q. You knew before the day that you switched
25 name tags with [REDACTED] that the process servers were
58
1 looking for you, didn't you?
2 A. No. I knew --
3 MR. LEOPOLD: Just answer it. It calls for
4 a yes or no.
5 THE WITNESS: Okay. No.
6 BY MR. TEIN:
7 Q. Now you can explain the answer that your
8 counsel stopped you from explaining.
Page 49
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document