This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. LEOPOLD | Attorney/Questioner |
Questioning the witness, instructing them to provide a 'yes or no' answer.
|
| MR. TEIN | Attorney/Questioner |
Questioning the witness about their knowledge of being served with a subpoena.
|
| THE WITNESS | Deponent |
An unnamed individual being questioned under oath about wearing someone else's name tag on a day they were to be serv...
|
| Unnamed female | Subject |
The person whose name tag the witness was wearing.
|
| Unnamed counsel | Attorney |
The witness's counsel, who is mentioned as having stopped the witness from explaining an answer.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight |
Mentioned in the document footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444), suggesting this document is part of records held by a Hous...
|
"Q. Your testimony under oath is that's just a coincidence, right? A. Total honesty."Source
"Q. It just happens to be the day that you were going to be served with a subpoena, correct? ... THE WITNESS: Yes."Source
"Q. You knew before the day that you switched name tags with [REDACTED] that the process servers were looking for you, didn't you? ... THE WITNESS: Okay. No."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,022 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document