Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Leopold

Person
Mentions
126
Relationships
31
Events
57
Documents
60
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
31 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the witness
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person MR. TEIN
Opposing counsel
10 Very Strong
7
View
person the witness
Client
9 Strong
4
View
person witness
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person the witness
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Unnamed witness
Professional
7
2
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
7
3
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. TEIN
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Legal representative
6
2
View
person MR. TEIN
Adversarial professional
6
2
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Unnamed Deponent
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Adversarial opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Unnamed female witness
Client
5
1
View
person Mr. Pincus
Professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed witness
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person Jack
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Unnamed witness
Client
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Lawsuit filing Mr. Leopold filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking fifty million dollars from Jeffrey Epstein o... federal court View
N/A Hearing A hearing that Mr. Leopold allegedly claimed to have, which prevented him from being available. M... N/A View
N/A N/A Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. Unknown (likely Florida bas... View
N/A Meeting A meeting to prepare for the day's deposition. N/A View
N/A N/A Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. Deposition room View
N/A N/A Cancelled Hearing Unknown Court View
N/A N/A Deposition hearing Unknown (likely Florida bas... View
N/A N/A Deposition of a witness Unknown (Likely Florida bas... View
N/A N/A Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. Unknown (Transcription serv... View
N/A N/A Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition Recess Deposition Room View
N/A N/A Deposition/Legal Proceeding Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... Unknown (Reporting firm bas... View
N/A N/A Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). Unknown View
2022-04-01 N/A Evidentiary Hearing Court View
2017-07-26 Deposition An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying about their age on MySpace pages, referenc... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition/testimony Questioning of a witness by Mr. Tein regarding what she told Epstein about her age, with objectio... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent about a photogr... N/A View
2017-07-26 N/A Mr. Leopold filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein in federal court. Federal Court View
2017-07-26 Deposition A question and answer session with an unidentified witness, as part of a legal proceeding. N/A View
2017-07-26 Legal proceeding A contentious exchange between attorneys during a deposition or hearing. Mr. Tein attempts to ask... N/A View
2017-07-26 Legal testimony A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives. N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness, and Mr. Leopold is prese... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A contentious exchange during a legal deposition where an attorney (Mr. Leopold) instructs a witn... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about allegedly lying and visiting a 'cr... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00033103.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about their parents filing a police report against Mr. Epstein. The witness is evasive and claims not to know answers, while their counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, citing lack of foundation and speculation.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033101.jpg

This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033099.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying and visiting a 'crack house' in Georgia. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, frequently objects and instructs the witness not to answer the questions.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033089.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript (page 101) processed on July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about a photograph involving Steven Lavelle and a man identified phonetically as Robbie Shergan. The opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to Mr. Tein interrupting the witness.

Deposition transcript / legal testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033084.jpg

This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033078.jpg

This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In this excerpt, an unidentified witness is questioned about their preparation for the deposition, which included a meeting with a 'Mr. Leopold' that morning. The witness also confirms they have previously read police reports related to the case and clarifies that a statement they gave to the police was in the form of a narrative police report, not a question-and-answer transcript.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg

This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033076.jpg

This document is page 88 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their mother's husband, Paul, and his potential interactions with reporters. The questioning then shifts to the witness's knowledge of a Detective Recarey and a potential deal involving cooperation against someone named Epstein, as well as any contact with people who have been to Epstein's house. The witness consistently denies any knowledge of these subjects, and their likely attorney, Mr. Leopold, makes an objection.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033075.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033074.jpg

This document is a single page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing a contentious exchange between two individuals, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, who are likely opposing attorneys. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding' and unprofessional conduct, while Mr. Leopold pleads to be allowed to make the record without interruption and calls for professionalism from all parties in the room. The exchange highlights a significant level of conflict and animosity between the two speakers during the legal proceeding.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033073.jpg

This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.

Deposition transcript / legal proceeding
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033069.jpg

This document is page 81 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of several individuals, including Tony Figueroa and Zack Bryan, and events that occurred at a house belonging to a Mr. Epstein. The witness denies knowing most of the people mentioned but confirms they know Zack Bryan, leading to further questioning about that relationship.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033064.jpg

This document is page 76 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Mr. Tein questions a witness regarding a car ride with an individual named Hayley and another unidentified person described as 'dark like a Spanish girl.' The witness denies knowing a specific redacted individual (alleged to be a good friend) and denies lying to the police. The witness acknowledges speaking about the case with their twin sister (name redacted) but claims the sister does not have an email address.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033063.jpg

This document is page 75 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their knowledge of Mr. Epstein, including whether he or his employees ever harmed the witness's father's property and a more serious allegation that Epstein almost killed the father. The questioning also probes a past statement the witness made to police about a trip to Epstein's house with a person named Hayley, suggesting the witness lied to authorities.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033060.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033057.jpg

This document is page 69 of a legal deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page where the witness's age was listed as 18. The witness admits the page is theirs and confirms that listing their age as 18 was a lie, with the questioning implying it was done to circumvent the platform's age restrictions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033056.jpg

This document is page 68 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an attorney named Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about lying about their age on MySpace, referencing specific exhibits. The witness admits to lying about being 18 but denies lying about being 19, while other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, interject during the questioning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033054.jpg

Page 66 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, attorney Mr. Tein, and attorney Mr. Leopold. The questioning focuses on the witness's alleged habit of lying about their age, specifically in relation to MySpace and obtaining body piercings. The witness denies lying to get piercings but clarifies they have one body piercing (excluding ears) after initially stating five.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033050.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Tein questions a redacted witness about an incident at the 'Quarterdeck Tavern' where the witness's manager, Justin, allegedly lied to process servers to hide the witness. The page opens with a contentious exchange between the lawyers before a recess is taken.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033049.jpg

A transcript page from a legal proceeding recording a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold accuses Tein of repetitive questioning, while Tein asks Leopold to stop yelling. The argument escalates when Leopold mistakenly calls Tein 'Lewis,' leading to an insult from Leopold suggesting Tein made no impression during a previous three-day evidentiary hearing.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033044.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about a photograph (marked 18-001), in which the deponent identifies themself and Tiffany Rich. Mr. Tein then characterizes Tiffany Rich as the deponent's friend from the Quarterdeck Tavern. Other attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger, are also present and interject to ensure the clarity of the record.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033047.jpg

This document is page 59 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from a deposition or hearing. It details a contentious exchange between attorneys, where Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning of a female witness, arguing that she has already answered the question multiple times and is being harassed. The other attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Goldberger, push back against Mr. Leopold's objections.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033046.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about her awareness of being sought and an incident where she switched name tags with a friend at her workplace, Quarterdeck, to avoid them. The witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, objects strongly to a question he deems harassment, highlighting a contentious legal exchange.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033043.jpg

This is page 55 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about an incident at the Quarterdeck Tavern where she allegedly asked co-workers to lie and switched name tags with a friend named Tiffany to avoid people serving papers. The witness denies asking anyone to lie but admits name tags were switched, claiming it was a coincidence common among staff. Attorneys Leopold and Goldberger discuss the marking of Exhibit 18-001 and photographs.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033042.jpg

This is page 54 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a female witness, accusing her of lying about her name to avoid being served a lawful subpoena and questioning her willingness to repeat a story she told police. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions and eventually instructs the witness not to answer, prompting Mr. Tein to ask to 'certify' the question. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a 2017 public records request date.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
7
As Recipient
2
Total
9

Availability for a hearing

From: Mr. Leopold
To: ["Mr. Tein's co-counsel"]

Mr. Tein alleges that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel, stating he was unavailable for a morning hearing when he was not.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Deposition Break and Evidence Preservation

From: Mr. Leopold
To: MR. TEIN

Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Spelling a word for the record

From: Mr. Leopold
To: the witness

Leopold asks witness to spell a word; Witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g'; Tein interrupts.

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning tactics and volume of voice

From: Mr. Leopold
To: MR. TEIN

Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.

Verbal dispute
N/A
Communication Source

Deposition Preparation

From: Mr. Leopold
To: witness

Preparation for the deposition testimony.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Marie Villafona
To: Mr. Leopold

Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.

Meeting/conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Deposition Objections

From: Mr. Leopold
To: Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Tein

Verbal argument regarding the validity of objections and scheduling conflicts during a deposition.

Meeting
2017-07-26
Communication Source

Deposition Preparation

From: Jane Doe
To: Mr. Leopold

Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.

Meeting
2008-02-20
Communication Source

Deposition Scheduling

From: Mr. Leopold
To: JACK A. GOLDBERGER

Agreement to schedule Jane Doe No. 1's deposition for Feb 20, 2008 and accept service.

Written agreement
2008-02-07
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search