This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a motion arguing for the admissibility of expert testimony from a Dr. Rocchio. The document refutes the defendant's claim that Dr. Rocchio's opinions are unreliable, asserting that the testimony on coercion, attachment, and grooming in abuser-victim relationships is well-supported and will help the jury understand the evidence at trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Raniere | Defendant |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Raniere'.
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Expert |
An expert witness whose opinions on coercion, attachment, and grooming are being discussed for admissibility in a trial.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Government agency |
A party in the legal case 'United States v. Raniere'.
|
| Court | Judicial body |
Referenced as the body that should permit Dr. Rocchio to testify.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case citation, referring to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
|
"Sexual abuse of minors frequently occurs through the use of manipulation or coercion in the context of an established relationship that is developed over time, rather than through the use of forcible rape. Minor victims are often subject to a strategic pattern of behaviors, often called grooming, that can take a variety of forms and function to render the victims vulnerable to abuse, to obscure the nature of the abuse, and to build trust and attachment with their abuser. The relationship of trust and attachment can prevent victims from being aware that what they are experiencing is abuse and can prevent disclosure."Source
"often called grooming."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,873 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document