DOJ-OGR-00016471.jpg
615 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
615 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the public release of evidence. Defense counsel Ms. Menninger urges the judge to compel the government to immediately submit any final redactions for defense exhibits J-8/9 and J-15, citing delays and media interest. Another attorney, Ms. Moe, begins to address the court on the same topic, noting a recent conversation she had with a Ms. Sternheim about the redactions.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Defense Counsel (implied) |
Speaker arguing for the prompt public release of redacted defense exhibits.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing and being addressed by the attorneys.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker addressing the court regarding redaction issues.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Unknown |
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as someone she spoke with about pending redaction issues.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
The opposing party in the legal case, responsible for proposing redactions to defense exhibits.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body being asked to rule on redactions and their submission deadline.
|
| media | industry |
Mentioned as having made requests for the exhibits in question.
|
| press | industry |
Used synonymously with 'media'; Ms. Menninger states she does not respond to them.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion was held regarding the timeline for the government to submit final redactions for defense exhibits J-8/9 and J-15 so they could be made publicly available.
Courtroom
Approximately 2022-08-01
Defense exhibits were admitted into evidence, as stated by Ms. Menninger ("a week ago Wednesday, so nine days ago").
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger, representing the defense, is arguing against the government's proposed timeline for redactions and asking the Court to compel them to act faster.
Ms. Moe states she spoke with Ms. Sternheim about "all the pending redaction issues," indicating they are colleagues or opposing counsel collaborating on the matter.
Key Quotes (3)
"Frankly, I think the time for giving more redactions has come and gone."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Expressing frustration with the government's delay in finalizing redactions for defense exhibits.)
DOJ-OGR-00016471.jpg
Quote #1
"And if they have any more, I'd ask that they submit them to the Court by this evening so the Court can rule on those additional redactions."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Requesting the court to set a firm deadline for the government to submit any further redactions.)
DOJ-OGR-00016471.jpg
Quote #2
"I've been getting requests from the media for those exhibits."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Citing media interest as a reason for urgency in making the exhibits public.)
DOJ-OGR-00016471.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,489 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 255 of 267 2283
LCAVMAX8
something I've conferred with the government about a few times,
including as of the last three days, I think once a day.
With respect to defense Exhibits J-8/9 and Defense
Exhibit J-15 --
THE COURT: Oddly, I remember them.
MS. MENNINGER: We all do. And I've been asking
for -- I submitted it with redactions that I thought were
appropriate. The government has said several times that they
thought they might have one or two more redactions. I've been
asking for those. I believe those were admitted in evidence a
week ago Wednesday, so nine days ago.
I think that they should be made publicly available.
The government has said, Well, let's do it next week, when
we're doing videos and things like that.
Frankly, I think the time for giving more redactions
has come and gone. And if they have any more, I'd ask that
they submit them to the Court by this evening so the Court can
rule on those additional redactions. Because I submitted them
with redactions in the first place, and I think I've been
getting requests from the media for those exhibits. I
obviously don't respond to the press, but I think it's an
indicia that they are interested in making whatever is going to
be publicly available happen sooner rather than later.
MS. MOE: Your Honor, I spoke with Ms. Sternheim this
morning about all the pending redaction issues. There are a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016471
LCAVMAX8
something I've conferred with the government about a few times,
including as of the last three days, I think once a day.
With respect to defense Exhibits J-8/9 and Defense
Exhibit J-15 --
THE COURT: Oddly, I remember them.
MS. MENNINGER: We all do. And I've been asking
for -- I submitted it with redactions that I thought were
appropriate. The government has said several times that they
thought they might have one or two more redactions. I've been
asking for those. I believe those were admitted in evidence a
week ago Wednesday, so nine days ago.
I think that they should be made publicly available.
The government has said, Well, let's do it next week, when
we're doing videos and things like that.
Frankly, I think the time for giving more redactions
has come and gone. And if they have any more, I'd ask that
they submit them to the Court by this evening so the Court can
rule on those additional redactions. Because I submitted them
with redactions in the first place, and I think I've been
getting requests from the media for those exhibits. I
obviously don't respond to the press, but I think it's an
indicia that they are interested in making whatever is going to
be publicly available happen sooner rather than later.
MS. MOE: Your Honor, I spoke with Ms. Sternheim this
morning about all the pending redaction issues. There are a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016471
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document