HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg

1.44 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
7
Quotes

Document Information

Type: News article / opinion piece (likely wall street journal based on author)
File Size: 1.44 MB
Summary

An opinion article by Kimberley Strassel discussing a conflict between the DOJ/FBI and the House Intelligence Committee regarding a top-secret intelligence source used in the investigation of the Trump campaign. The article highlights Speaker Paul Ryan's support for Chairman Devin Nunes's subpoenas and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein's resistance to providing the information. The document bears a House Oversight footer stamp.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Kimberley A. Strassel Author
Author of the article
Paul Ryan Speaker of the House
Gave a press conference supporting Devin Nunes's request for details
Devin Nunes Intelligence Chairman
Issued a letter and subpoena demanding details on a secret source
Rod Rosenstein Deputy Attorney General
Accused the House of extortion and refused to open FBI files
Donald Trump Political Figure
Mentioned in the context of the 'Trump campaign' investigation

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee; accused of hiding information
Congress
Battling with DOJ over information access
House Intelligence Committee
Receiving briefing about top-secret source
FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation; subject of oversight regarding Trump campaign investigation
White House
Asked by Justice to back its stonewall
House Oversight
Mentioned in document footer stamp

Timeline (1 events)

May 10, 2018
Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members about a top-secret intelligence source
Washington D.C. (Implied)

Relationships (2)

Devin Nunes Adversarial Rod Rosenstein
Nunes issued subpoena; Rosenstein accused House of extortion
Paul Ryan Supportive Devin Nunes
Ryan called Nunes's request 'wholly appropriate'

Key Quotes (7)

"wholly appropriate"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #1
"completely within the scope"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #2
"something that probably should have been answered a while ago"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #3
"extortion"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #4
"declining to open the FBI’s files to review"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #5
"loss of human lives"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #6
"whatever is in these files is going to prove very uncomfortable to the FBI"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110.jpg
Quote #7

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,785 characters)

By
Kimberley A. Strassel
May 10, 2018 6:50 p.m. ET
1663 COMMENTS
o
o
o
o
o
The Department of Justice lost its latest battle with Congress Thursday when it agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members about a top-secret intelligence source that was part of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Even without official confirmation of that source’s name, the news so far holds some stunning implications.
Among them is that the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation outright hid critical information from a congressional investigation. In a Thursday press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’s request for details on this secret source was “wholly appropriate,” “completely within the scope” of the committee’s long-running FBI investigation, and “something that probably should have been answered a while ago.” Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it.
House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”
This is desperation, and it strongly suggests that whatever is in these files is going to prove very uncomfortable to the FBI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021110

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document