DOJ-OGR-00001271.jpg

809 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
6
Locations
6
Events
0
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 809 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated May 23, 2021. It argues that France can legally deport individuals who have been stripped of their French nationality, citing the case of Djamel Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen convicted of terrorism. The text explains how Beghal's citizenship was revoked to facilitate his removal to Algeria, navigating European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law on the matter.

People (6)

Name Role Context
WILLIAM JULIÉ AVOCAT À LA COUR – ATTORNEY AT LAW
Appears as the author/filer of the document in the header.
Babar Ahmad
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom'.
Djamel Beghal dual French-Algerian citizen
Used as an example of a dual citizen convicted of terrorist offenses, deprived of French nationality, and deported to...
Daoudi
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'Daoudi v. France' in a footnote.
Trabelsi
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'Trabelsi c. Belgique' in a footnote.
Othman
Mentioned as a party in the legal case 'Othman c. Royaume-Uni' in a footnote.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
ECtHR court
European Court of Human Rights, cited for its case law regarding deportation and extradition.
French government government agency
Mentioned for its decision to deprive Djamel Beghal of his French nationality.
WJ AVOCATS company
Inferred from the email address (wj@wjavocats.com) and website (www.wjavocats.com) in the footer, representing Willia...

Timeline (6 events)

2009-12-03
ECtHR ruling in the case of Daoudi v. France.
France
2012-01-17
ECtHR ruling in the case of Othman c. Royaume-Uni.
Royaume-Uni
2012-04-12
ECtHR ruling in the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom.
United Kingdom
2014-09-04
ECtHR ruling in the case of Trabelsi c. Belgique.
Belgique
Djamel Beghal was deported to Algeria after being deprived of his French nationality.
From France to Algeria
The French government decided to deprive Djamel Beghal of his French nationality.
France

Locations (6)

Location Context
Mentioned as a party in the case 'Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom'.
The country discussed in relation to its laws on deportation, citizenship, and extradition.
The country to which Djamel Beghal was deported and where he faced trial.
Belgium, mentioned in the case name 'Trabelsi c. Belgique' in a footnote.
United Kingdom, mentioned in the case name 'Othman c. Royaume-Uni' in a footnote.
Address listed in the footer for William Julié's law office.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,544 characters)

Case: 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 1702 Filed 05/23/21 Page 171 of 518
WILLIAM JULIÉ
AVOCAT À LA COUR – ATTORNEY AT LAW
extradition and other removals”, ECtHR 12 April 2012, Babar Ahmad and Others v.
the United Kingdom, no. 24027/07, §168).
23. France has no difficulty with deporting individuals who have lost French nationality by
application of Article 25 of the Civil Code, which enumerates the list of crimes that may
give rise to a deprivation of citizenship. For example, a dual French-Algerian citizen
named Djamel Beghal was recently deported to Algeria after he was convicted of
terrorist offences and subsequently deprived of his French nationality².
24. While in custody in France, Djamel Beghal was also convicted in absentia to a term of
prison in Algeria, but his extradition initially seemed impossible, not because he used
to be a French citizen, but because the case law of the ECtHR specifically prohibits
State parties from deporting persons deprived of their nationality to the State of which
they remain a national, when there is a risk of torture or degrading treatment³. Beghal
was eventually deported to Algeria where he was arrested upon landing for the purpose
of standing trial. In this case, the French government’s decision to deprive Djamel
Beghal of his French nationality was clearly intended to allow for his removal from
France, whether through extradition or deportation, as both means of removal were
conceivable at the time. Had there not been a risk of violation of the ECHR at the time
of the Algerian extradition request, he may well have been extradited as opposed to
deported a few years later, when that risk was eliminated.
25. In any case, the deportation of formerly French citizens shows that the loss of French
nationality prevents any retroactive application of domestic provisions which are
intended to protect French nationals, be it from deportation or extradition.
² https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2018/07/16/incertitude-sur-le-sort-de-l-islamiste-djamel-beghal-qui-sort-
de-prison-lundi_5332053_3224.html
³ ECtHR 3 December 2009, Daoudi v. France, application no. 19576/08.
or 4 sept. 2014, Trabelsi c. Belgique, req. n° 140/10, 17 janv. 2012, Othman c. Royaume-Uni, req. n° 8139/09. For
more details, http://www.revuedlf.com/cedh/eloignement-des-etrangers-terroristes-et-article-3-de-la-convention-
europeenne-des-droits-de-lhomme/
5
51, RUE AMPÈRE - 75017 PARIS - TÉL. 01 88 33 51 80 – FAX. 01 88 33 51 81
wj@wjavocats.com - www.wjavocats.com - PALAIS C1652
DOJ-OGR-00001271

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document