51, RUE AMPÈRE - 75017 PARIS

Location
Mentions
48
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
24

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00001272.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated May 23, 2021. Julié argues that the intention of French lawmakers regarding Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure was not to protect individuals from extradition after they have lost their French nationality. He supports this by citing past instances where the French government deported such individuals for criminal offenses.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001271.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated May 23, 2021. It argues that France can legally deport individuals who have been stripped of their French nationality, citing the case of Djamel Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen convicted of terrorism. The text explains how Beghal's citizenship was revoked to facilitate his removal to Algeria, navigating European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law on the matter.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001269.jpg

This document is a page from a legal brief authored by attorney William Julié, filed on May 23, 2021. The brief argues that under French law, the prohibition on extraditing nationals should only apply to individuals who are French citizens at the time of the extradition request, not to those who have lost their citizenship. This interpretation aims to prevent the fraudulent acquisition of nationality as a means to escape justice.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001202.jpg

This legal document, authored by French lawyer William Julié on December 18, 2020, is a response to a U.S. government memorandum concerning a defendant's release. Julié critiques the U.S. government's reliance on a letter from the French Minister of Justice, arguing it misinterprets French extradition law by ignoring the supremacy of international treaties, such as the extradition treaty between the USA and France, over domestic statutes. The core argument is that France may indeed be able to extradite its own citizens under these treaties, contrary to the U.S. government's position.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002224(1).jpg

This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 23, 2020, by French lawyer William Julié regarding the extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Julié argues that the US-France Extradition Treaty allows France discretion to extradite its own citizens, countering the DOJ's reliance on the 2007 'Peterson case' precedent. The text analyzes the Peterson case, noting it was a discretionary decision by the Ministry of Justice rather than a court ruling, and references a 2007 letter from Senators Obama and Durbin regarding that matter.

Legal memorandum / court filing exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002223.jpg

This legal document, authored by French lawyer William Julié on December 18, 2020, is a response to a US government memorandum regarding a defendant's motion for release. Julié refutes the US government's interpretation of a letter from the French Minister of Justice, arguing that their analysis of French extradition law is incomplete. He asserts that under the French Constitution (Article 55) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Article 696), international treaties—such as the extradition treaty between the US and France—prevail over domestic law, meaning the key issue is the treaty's terms, not general French legislation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002223(1).jpg

This legal document, authored by French lawyer William Julié on December 18, 2020, is a response to a US government memorandum concerning a defendant's release. Julié argues that the US government's reliance on a letter from the French Minister of Justice is misplaced, as it selectively quotes French law while ignoring the supremacy of international extradition treaties under the French Constitution. The core argument is that the extradition treaty between the USA and France should govern the case, not the specific article of the French criminal code cited by the Minister.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002147.jpg

This legal analysis, authored by William Julié, discusses the factors making it highly likely that the French government would extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the United States. It considers the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, Ms Maxwell's dual American and French nationalities, her ties to the USA, and the unlikelihood of France prosecuting her for crimes committed in the USA, especially if she fled France in violation of bail.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002144.jpg

This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the legal framework surrounding the extradition of a country's own nationals, with a specific focus on France and its treaty with the USA. It contrasts different legal approaches under international law, noting that some countries constitutionally prohibit extraditing citizens while others, particularly common law jurisdictions, permit it. The document also examines European law, including the European Convention on Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant, which has different rules for member states.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002141.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié regarding the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from France to the USA. The filing argues that under the US-France Extradition Treaty, a claim of political motivation is unlikely to succeed in preventing her extradition, citing a history of French courts granting US requests and distinguishing her case from a past instance where extradition to Russia was denied on political grounds.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002140.jpg

This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell in the context of French law for an extradition request. The document argues that the alleged conduct would qualify as the crime of 'proxénétisme' (procuring) under the French Criminal Code, with enhanced penalties because it involved a minor. The author concludes that the principle of dual criminality would not be an obstacle to Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002138.jpg

This document is a legal opinion by attorney William Julié analyzing the potential outcome of an extradition request from the United States to France for Ghislaine Maxwell, should she flee there. The analysis focuses on the general bars to extradition under French law, particularly the requirement for French courts to consider human rights violations in the requesting state. The author concludes it is highly unlikely that French authorities would refuse to enforce an extradition decree for Maxwell, despite her French citizenship.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002137.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, authored by attorney William Julié. It describes the procedural step of making a potential application to the European Court of Human Rights against France once all domestic legal options have been exhausted. The document also notes the possibility of requesting interim measures, such as suspending an applicant's extradition, pending the court's decision.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002136.jpg

This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It states a key procedural requirement from the 1996 US-France Extradition Treaty, specifying that a person subject to an extradition decree must be handed over within one month of notification.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002134.jpg

This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, by attorney William Julié, outlines the fourth stage of the French extradition process. It details the procedure when a requested person consents to extradition, referencing specific articles of the French Code of Criminal Procedure and international agreements, such as the extradition treaty between the EU and the USA. The document explains how consent allows for a simplified and expedited surrender, including a potential waiver of the rule of specialty.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002130.jpg

This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié and filed on December 14, 2020, provides a background on the bail hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 14, 2020. It highlights the US Government's argument and the Court's decision to deny bail, both of which centered on Maxwell's French citizenship and France's policy of not extraditing its nationals, which established her as a flight risk. The report's stated purpose is to legally evaluate the validity of the claim that France does not extradite its citizens.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002129.jpg

This document is a table of contents for a legal analysis prepared by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the steps of the French extradition procedure and analyzes the potential outcome of an extradition request from the United States for Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on French law and the extradition treaty between the two countries.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002128.jpg

This document, part of a legal case filed on December 14, 2020, is a legal opinion from attorney William Julié regarding extradition procedures. It outlines the roles of the Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Chamber, and explains that while there is no specific timeframe for a final government decree, the process can be expedited to a few weeks if the request is deemed urgent.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002127.jpg

This legal document, authored by French attorney William Julié, provides an analysis of the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. Julié argues that despite her French citizenship, French authorities would likely grant an extradition request because the US-France extradition treaty does not prohibit extraditing nationals. He further states that factors like her US citizenship, a signed waiver, and the obligation for France to try her if extradition is denied, make her return to the USA highly probable, especially in a scenario where she had fled in violation of bail.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002126.jpg

This document is a legal opinion written by French attorney William Julié regarding the extradition of French nationals to the United States. It was requested by Olivier Laude on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to support bail proceedings, arguing that French law permits extradition to the US and that Maxwell intends to waive her rights to fight such extradition in French courts. The document serves to assure US authorities that Maxwell would not be shielded by French non-extradition principles if she were released on bail and fled to France.

Legal opinion / court exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020121.jpg

This document is a page from a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It analyzes the extradition treaty between France and the USA, arguing that France has the discretion to extradite its own citizens. The text specifically rebuts a DOJ argument based on the 2007 'Hans Peterson' case (involving Senators Obama and Durbin), stating that the Peterson outcome was a discretionary ministerial decision rather than a binding judicial precedent.

Legal opinion / memorandum (exhibit in court filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002797.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié, dated March 23, 2021. It argues that France can legally deport individuals who have been stripped of their French nationality, using the case of Djamel Beghal as a primary example. Beghal, a dual French-Algerian citizen convicted of terrorism, was deprived of his French citizenship to facilitate his deportation to Algeria, a move intended to circumvent ECtHR prohibitions on removal to countries with a risk of torture.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002794.jpg

This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002793.jpg

This document is a legal memorandum authored by French attorney William Julié on March 14, 2021, filed in the US case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides a legal opinion countering the French Ministry of Justice's stance, arguing that if Maxwell were to renounce her French citizenship (which she stated she is prepared to do), the French government would be legally entitled to extradite her to the US. The memo specifically refutes a March 9, 2021 letter from Philippe Jaeglé of the French Ministry of Justice regarding the non-extradition of nationals.

Legal memorandum / attorney opinion letter
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity