HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854.jpg

2.04 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
8
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book draft / memoir manuscript (evidence file)
File Size: 2.04 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a memoir or draft by Ehud Barak (page 97), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details a meeting in the Oval Office kitchen with Bill Clinton and Dennis Ross shortly after November 9 (likely 2000), where they discussed 'Camp David-plus' peace parameters involving the West Bank, Jerusalem, and refugees. The text also covers Barak's domestic political maneuvering in Israel, specifically considering a unity coalition with Ariel Sharon (Likud) following the lynching in Ramallah.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator / Prime Minister of Israel (implied)
Author of the text (indicated by header '/ BARAK /'), discussing negotiations with Clinton and domestic Israeli polit...
Bill Clinton US President
Met with narrator in Oval Office; presented peace parameters.
Dennis Ross US Diplomat/Envoy
Present at the dinner meeting with Clinton and the narrator.
Yasser Arafat Palestinian Leader
Visited Washington on Nov 9; discussed peace terms with Clinton.
Ariel Sharon Israeli Politician
Referred to as 'Sharon' and 'Arik'; potential coalition partner for the narrator.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Knesset
Israeli Parliament, mentioned regarding government survival.
Labor
Political party in Israel.
Likud
Political party in Israel.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (3 events)

November 12 (approximate)
Dinner meeting regarding peace negotiations.
Oval Office kitchen area, Washington
November 9
Arafat's scheduled visit to Washington to see Clinton.
Washington
Prior to November 2000
Lynching in Ramallah
Ramallah

Locations (8)

Location Context
City where meetings took place.
Specific meeting location (kitchen area attached to it).
Mentioned regarding land swaps.
Territory discussed in peace negotiations.
City discussed in peace negotiations.
Holy site discussed regarding control.
Country.
Location of a lynching incident.

Relationships (3)

Ehud Barak Diplomatic Bill Clinton
Met for dinner to discuss peace plans.
Ehud Barak Political Rival/Potential Ally Ariel Sharon
Discussed forming a unity coalition between Labor and Likud.
Bill Clinton Diplomatic Yasser Arafat
Clinton presented negotiating paper to Arafat.

Key Quotes (4)

"what is Arab will be Palestinian, and what is Jewish, Israeli."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854.jpg
Quote #1
"mid-90-percent"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854.jpg
Quote #2
"Until it was reigned in, I would not be party to rewarding Arafat diplomatically."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854.jpg
Quote #3
"The obvious, or at least the most mathematically secure, choice would have been a deal with Sharon."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,267 characters)

/ BARAK / 97
summit, we responded. The only, brief, lull came when Arafat feared the
Americans would cancel his scheduled visit to Washington to see Clinton on
November 9. I was due to follow him three days later.
I met Clinton and Dennis Ross over dinner in a little kitchen area attached to the
Oval Office, and both seemed surprisingly upbeat. The President said he’d told
Arafat the broad points that would be in the new American negotiating paper. It
was Camp David-plus. Assuming all issues in a final peace were agreed, the
Palestinians would now end up, after a land swap near Gaza, with a “mid-90-
percent” share of the West Bank. On Jerusalem, the guiding principle would be
“what is Arab will be Palestinian, and what is Jewish, Israeli.” On the Temple
Mount, the Haram al-Sharif, each side would have control of its own holy sites.
Finally, though Palestinian refugees would be free to return in unlimited numbers
to a new Palestinian state, there would be no “right of return” to pre-1967 Israel.
The President told me that after he’d run all this by Arafat, he and Dennis had
asked whether “in principle” these were parameters he could accept. Arafat had
said yes.
I assume they expected me to say the same. But I told them I couldn’t give them
an answer. What concerned me now was the violence. Until it was reigned in, I
would not be party to rewarding Arafat diplomatically. I urged the Americans to
make ending the violence their focus as well, because if they didn’t get tougher on
Arafat’s noncompliance with anything resembling a de-escalation, Israel would do
so.
* * *
Since the Knesset had returned before my trip to Washington, I’d needed first to
make sure my government would survive. The obvious, or at least the most
mathematically secure, choice would have been a deal with Sharon. Especially
since the lynching in Ramallah, there were calls from politicians on all sides for a
unity coalition between Labor and Likud. Arik definitely wanted in. The main
issue reamined the peace process. I didn’t find Arik’s specific objections to Camp
David hard to deal with. As I’d said from the start, the fact that we’d failed to reach
an agreement at the summit meant that any concessions I’d considered were now,
383
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011854

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document