DOJ-OGR-00013194.jpg

458 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 458 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning revisits her prior deposition, confirming her trust in her attorneys. It is also established that a complaint she previously filed in federal court was not against a Ms. Maxwell.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined ("Carolyn - cross"). Her answers are labeled with "A.".
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
An attorney present at the proceeding, addressing the court and objecting to a question.
Ms. Maxwell Mentioned individual
Mentioned in a question to clarify that a complaint filed by the witness was not against her.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
THE COURT Government agency
Represents the judge presiding over the legal proceeding, directing the questioning.
federal court Government agency
Mentioned as the venue where the witness filed a complaint.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her prior deposition and a complaint she filed in federal court.
Courtroom
Carolyn MR. PAGLIUCA THE COURT Unnamed Questioner

Relationships (3)

Carolyn Client-attorney her attorneys
The witness is quoted from a deposition saying, "I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my attorneys."
MR. PAGLIUCA Professional THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the court respectfully as "your Honor".
Carolyn Legal Ms. Maxwell
The document clarifies that a complaint filed by Carolyn was not against Ms. Maxwell, indicating their relationship within a specific legal context.

Key Quotes (3)

"No, I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my attorneys."
Source
— Carolyn (A quote from the witness's prior deposition being read into the record during cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00013194.jpg
Quote #1
"That question was objected to, your Honor, so I'm not going to read it."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (An attorney refusing to read a question from a deposition transcript because it was previously objected to.)
DOJ-OGR-00013194.jpg
Quote #2
"The complaint that you filed in federal court was not against Ms. Maxwell; correct?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (A question posed to the witness to clarify the defendant in a lawsuit she filed.)
DOJ-OGR-00013194.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,068 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 181 of 264 1619
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
2 Q. Do you recall testifying in your deposition, under oath?
3 A. Yes.
4 THE COURT: You can leave it up for reading the
5 question.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Go ahead.
8 Q. You were asked:
9 "Q. Did you read the complaint before it was filed?
10 "A. Yeah, I read the complaint.
11 "Q. Did you -- when you read the complaint, did you notice
12 there was anything missing from it?
13 "A. No, I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my
14 attorneys."
15 Correct?
16 A. Right.
17 Q. And moving on to the next question on the same page:
18 "Q. Did you tell anyone, your lawyers or anybody --
19 THE COURT: Just a second.
20 MR. PAGLIUCA: That question was objected to, your
21 Honor, so I'm not going to read it.
22 THE COURT: Okay.
23 Q. The complaint that you filed in federal court was not
24 against Ms. Maxwell; correct?
25 A. Correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013194

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document