DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
480 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
480 KB
Summary
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied by case number). The testimony focuses on flight logs, specifically confirming that Mark Epstein does not appear on passenger lists with an individual referred to as 'Jane'. Rodgers admits to writing 'one female' in logs for unknown passengers and acknowledges that while these entries *could* refer to Jane, he cannot confirm it definitively. The testimony establishes Jane first appears in logs in 1996, with no records in 1994 or 1995.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Person being cross-examined; pilot or log keeper who wrote entries like 'one female'.
|
| Mark Epstein | Subject of inquiry |
Brother of Jeffrey Epstein; discussed regarding whether he was on flights with 'Jane'.
|
| Jane | Subject of inquiry |
Likely a pseudonym for a victim/witness; discussed regarding presence on flight logs in 1994, 1995, and 1996.
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Interrogator |
Person asking the questions (Q).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Relationships (2)
Witness confirms they did not see Mark Epstein's name on flights with Jane.
Attorney asks: 'instances where you wrote "one female"'
Key Quotes (3)
"You're not aware of any other flight where someone with Jane's first name or first and last name ever flew with Mark Epstein; right? ... Correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #1
"Now, you mentioned that, occasionally, you write one female for someone you don't know who happens to be a female passenger; right?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #2
"But sitting here today, you can't say that any one of those instances where you wrote 'one female' was actually Jane flying on that flight; right? ... It could have been."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,222 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 262 1927
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
1 A. I don't know.
2 Q. Well, we just looked at the passenger list for those four
3 flights and we didn't see Mark Epstein's names on those
4 flights; correct?
5 A. Correct.
6 Q. You're not aware of any other flight where someone with
7 Jane's first name or first and last name ever flew with Mark
8 Epstein; right?
9 A. Correct.
10 Q. And there are no flights with Jane in 1994, for example?
11 A. Correct.
12 Q. The first one we saw was '96?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. And there are no flights with Jane in '95 either?
15 A. Correct.
16 Q. Now, you mentioned that, occasionally, you write one female
17 for someone you don't know who happens to be a female
18 passenger; right?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. But sitting here today, you can't say that any one of those
21 instances where you wrote "one female" was actually Jane flying
22 on that flight; right?
23 A. It could have been.
24 Q. Could have been, but you don't know one way or the other;
25 right?
2 Q. Well, we just looked at the passenger list for those four
3 flights and we didn't see Mark Epstein's names on those
4 flights; correct?
5 A. Correct.
6 Q. You're not aware of any other flight where someone with
7 Jane's first name or first and last name ever flew with Mark
8 Epstein; right?
9 A. Correct.
10 Q. And there are no flights with Jane in 1994, for example?
11 A. Correct.
12 Q. The first one we saw was '96?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. And there are no flights with Jane in '95 either?
15 A. Correct.
16 Q. Now, you mentioned that, occasionally, you write one female
17 for someone you don't know who happens to be a female
18 passenger; right?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. But sitting here today, you can't say that any one of those
21 instances where you wrote "one female" was actually Jane flying
22 on that flight; right?
23 A. It could have been.
24 Q. Could have been, but you don't know one way or the other;
25 right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019078
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document