DOJ-OGR-00019671.jpg
477 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
477 KB
Summary
This is a legal motion filed on October 8, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., requests permission to file an unredacted reply brief under seal. The motion is part of an appeal concerning a lower court order by Judge Nathan which denied a request to modify a criminal protective order.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Defendant-Appellant |
Named as the Defendant-Appellant in the case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL. She is filing a motion th...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who issued an order that is the subject of this appeal.
|
| Giuffre |
Mentioned as a party in a related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | government agency |
The court where this legal document, an appeal, is filed.
|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The Plaintiff-Appellee in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | government agency |
The court from which the appeal originates.
|
| Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. | company |
The law firm representing Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-10-08
Filing of an 'Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Reply Brief under Seal' by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
An appeal addressing an order by Judge Nathan that declined to modify a criminal protective order.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the United States District Court from which the appeal is being made.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states that Ghislaine Maxwell is acting 'through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.', indicating a client-attorney relationship.
The document identifies them as opposing parties in a legal case, Plaintiff-Appellee and Defendant-Appellant, respectively.
The document mentions a related case, 'Giuffre v. Maxwell', indicating they are opposing parties in another legal matter.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (783 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page2 of 5
20-3061
United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit
the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
—against—
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 20-CR-330 (AJN)
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 20-CR-330 (AJN)
Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Reply Brief
under Seal
under Seal
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon,
Morgan and Foreman, P.C., moves unopposed for leave to file her unredacted
reply brief under seal. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:
Morgan and Foreman, P.C., moves unopposed for leave to file her unredacted
reply brief under seal. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:
This appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a
criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413,
criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413,
1
DOJ-OGR-00019671
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document