This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense is attacking the credibility of a witness (referred to as 'she') by contrasting her testimony—that she was poor ('didn't have lunch money') and that Epstein paid for her schooling—with documentary evidence from 1995 and 1996. The evidence cited includes Interlochen applications where she denied receiving individual funding and CBP records showing extensive international travel to Italy and Europe.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Speaker delivering the summation argument.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Alleged Financier |
Mentioned as allegedly paying for the witness's schooling, though the defense argues the paperwork contradicts this.
|
| Unnamed Witness ('She') | Witness/Accuser |
The subject of the testimony; attended Interlochen, toured with a Broadway production, traveled internationally.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Interlochen Arts Camp |
School/Camp the witness attended in 1995 and 1996.
|
|
| Customs and Border Protection |
Source of travel records.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team mentioned in line 25.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the touring group performed.
|
|
|
Destination of an international trip for a vocal competition.
|
|
|
Destination of a family trip.
|
|
|
Location of the arts camp.
|
"she doesn't mention that Epstein is providing her any support or paying for her to go."Source
"This person who said she didn't have lunch money, she's going to Italy for an international trip"Source
"she says no, while she came in here and told you that Epstein was paying for her."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,588 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document