unnamed witness ('she')
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Interaction |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Massage | Ghislaine gave the witness a massage on her chest and upper breast. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Assault | Epstein attempted to hold the witness's hand in a movie theater, which she perceived as 'sexualiz... | movie theater | View |
| N/A | Massage | The witness received foot massages, which she later told the government in May 2020 she didn't re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip to New Mexico was planned. The witness initially stated in 2006 her sister was supposed to... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Trial testimony | A witness gave testimony about her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein, which is now being discus... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal acts | A series of alleged events including encounters where a witness's breasts were touched, an orgy, ... | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Recollection/statement | A witness stated she did not have a recollection of whether Ghislaine touched her during their en... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018356.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding the scope of cross-examination. The government objects to identifying a specific lawyer representing a witness to avoid implying a 'broader conspiracy,' and the Judge rules on what questions are permissible before deciding not to seal the discussion.
DOJ-OGR-00018274.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Moe and the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs of a 'massage room' inside a residence. The Judge sustains an objection to the photos because they were taken over 20 years after the events described by a witness, and depict 'highly mobile items' that may not accurately reflect the room's state at the relevant time.
DOJ-OGR-00018273.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring a legal argument between an attorney (Ms. Moe) and the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs. The attorney argues the photos corroborate a witness's 'blind description' of a residence's interior. The Judge expresses skepticism due to the significant passage of time (15-20 years) and the fact that the photos may depict 'movable items' rather than permanent structures.
DOJ-OGR-00017617.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to the Judge that a photograph of a witness's house was not disclosed earlier because it was intended solely as impeachment material to contradict the witness's testimony, rather than evidence for the case-in-chief. The Judge and Mr. Everdell discuss Rule 16 discovery obligations, with the Judge noting that prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach likely agrees with the procedural distinction.
DOJ-OGR-00017136.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney summarizes the testimony of a witness who visited New York with her sister, detailing innocent activities (Blue Man Group, The Met) and two meetings with Epstein: one in his office regarding college applications and one at a movie theater where he held her hand. The defense emphasizes that the witness testified Maxwell was not present for any of these events and argues there is no evidence of Maxwell's involvement in targeting this witness.
DOJ-OGR-00017127.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the defense summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a key witness's testimony is inconsistent, specifically highlighting that the witness admitted she does not recall Ghislaine Maxwell touching her, giving her massage instructions, or being present during specific sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein, contradicting the government's narrative.
DOJ-OGR-00017120.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense is attacking the credibility of a witness (referred to as 'she') by contrasting her testimony—that she was poor ('didn't have lunch money') and that Epstein paid for her schooling—with documentary evidence from 1995 and 1996. The evidence cited includes Interlochen applications where she denied receiving individual funding and CBP records showing extensive international travel to Italy and Europe.
DOJ-OGR-00014503.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues that a key witness ('she') has a poor and inconsistent memory, noting the absence of her name in flight logs alongside 'famous people.' Menninger highlights discrepancies between the witness's testimony and her statements in December 2019 and February 2020, where she claimed lack of recollection.
DOJ-OGR-00017597.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving a legal dispute over the admissibility of impeachment evidence. Ms. Menninger (Defense) argues that she was not required to produce impeachment photographs to the government prior to trial, while Ms. Comey (Government) requests to brief the issue. The discussion specifically references photographs of the 'Epstein home' taken recently (2021/last year) being used to discuss past events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022156.jpg
This document consists of two pages (258-259) from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), reproduced in a House Oversight file. It contains a transcript of a Q&A, likely a deposition. The text discusses a potential witness who is friends with Virginia Roberts and allegations that lawyers Edwards and Paul Cassell acted unethically or pressured someone. The deponent describes making phone calls from New York to a man to request a conversation with his wife, Rebecca.
Massage from Ghislaine
The witness testified from the stand that Ghislaine massaged her chest and upper breast.
Foot massages
The witness told the government in May of 2020 that she didn't remember the foot massages being sexualized.
Trip to New Mexico
The witness told the government in 2006 that the original purpose of her trip to New Mexico was that her sister was going to be there to accompany her.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity