This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell discusses the plan to call a notary, Keith Rooney, to testify about authenticated land registry documents and records from a Mr. Grumbridge in London. The purpose of this evidence is to prove that Ghislaine Maxwell did not reside at a specific property prior to 1996.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding the admissibility of evidence and the testimony of Keith Rooney.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the purpose of the evidence.
|
| Keith Rooney | Notary |
Visited the land registry, consulate, and Mr. Grumbridge's office to obtain/certify documents.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the inquiry regarding her residence at a specific address before 1996.
|
| Mr. Grumbridge | Record Holder |
Has an office in London containing files and agreements for sale relevant to the case.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Land Registry |
Source of certified copies regarding property title transfer.
|
|
| Consulate |
Where documents were apostilled to become foreign public records.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Mr. Grumbridge's office.
|
|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number and reporters.
|
"We have a notary named Keith Rooney who we plan to call today who has gone to the land registry and has obtained certified copies of the land registry entries for this property showing when the title transferred to Ms. Maxwell."Source
"All of this is in an effort to prove that Ms. Maxwell did not live at this address before 1996?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,574 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document