Mr. Grumbridge
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
Stanhope Mews
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Keith Rooney
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Property transaction | A prior ownership transaction of Stanhope Mews. | Stanhope Mews | View |
| N/A | N/A | Keith Rooney visited Mr. Grumbridge's office to check files and certify documents. | London | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016500.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between counsel (Mr. Rohrbach) and the court. The parties discuss the potential testimony of Mr. Grumbridge regarding the ownership of a property called Stanhope Mews and agree to confer on a stipulation. The court then moves to address a government motion to exclude parts of the anticipated expert testimony of Dr. Loftus concerning suggestive investigative and therapeutic techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013876.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between counsel and the judge regarding the admissibility of testimony. The parties discuss potential testimony from Mr. Grumbridge concerning the prior ownership of a property called Stanhope Mews. The court then addresses a government motion to exclude parts of Dr. Loftus's anticipated expert testimony on suggestive interview techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013870.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing the admissibility of evidence related to a property transfer. One party presents land registry records and an attorney's files to show ownership passing from 'the O'Neills' to 'Ms. Maxwell' in the 1990s. An opposing attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues this evidence is overly confusing, involves complex British real estate law, and is irrelevant to when the defendant actually occupied the property, and would therefore prejudice the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013869.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from August 2022 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Mr. Everdell explains to the Court the timeline of a real estate purchase by Ms. Maxwell from a couple named O'Neill. The records show contracts were exchanged in December 1996, the deal closed in January 1997, and the official title transfer was recorded in the Land Registry in March 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00013867.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell discusses the plan to call a notary, Keith Rooney, to testify about authenticated land registry documents and records from a Mr. Grumbridge in London. The purpose of this evidence is to prove that Ghislaine Maxwell did not reside at a specific property prior to 1996.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity