DOJ-OGR-00020367.jpg
620 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
620 KB
Summary
This legal document outlines the procedural history of a case involving a defendant named Maxwell. After Maxwell appealed two of Judge Nathan's bail decisions and was denied pretrial release on April 27, 2021, she did not file a renewed motion. Instead, on April 29, 2021, she submitted a letter to Judge Nathan requesting the court to order the MDC to stop or justify the 15-minute light surveillance that was disrupting her sleep.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Mentioned throughout the document in relation to her conditions of confinement, bail decisions, appeals, and motions.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge whose bail decisions were appealed by Maxwell and to whom Maxwell later submitted a letter.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Ordered by the court to submit regular updates regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement.
|
| Court | judicial body |
The judicial body that affirmed Judge Nathan's bail decisions and denied Maxwell's motion for pretrial release.
|
| District Court | judicial body |
The court identified as the proper venue to address requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions. Maxwell submitt...
|
| MDC | detention center |
The facility where Maxwell is confined and where her sleeping conditions are a subject of concern. Maxwell requested ...
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-04-27
The Court affirmed Judge Nathan's bail decisions and denied Maxwell's motion for pretrial release.
Court
2021-04-29
Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan regarding her sleeping conditions at the MDC.
District Court
Maxwell appealed Judge Nathan's latter two bail decisions and moved for pretrial release pending appeal.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where Maxwell's sleeping conditions were being monitored with 15-minute light surveillance.
|
Relationships (1)
Maxwell is a litigant (defendant/appellant) in a case before Judge Nathan. She appealed the judge's decisions and later wrote a letter directly to the judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions"Source
— Court
(From the Court's order, describing the type of request that should be addressed to the District Court.)
DOJ-OGR-00020367.jpg
Quote #1
"should be addressed to the District Court."Source
— Court
(The Court's instruction on where requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions should be directed.)
DOJ-OGR-00020367.jpg
Quote #2
"to address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive"Source
— Maxwell
(The request made by Maxwell in her letter to Judge Nathan on April 29, 2021.)
DOJ-OGR-00020367.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,447 characters)
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page9 of 24
monitored Maxwell’s conditions of confinement, including by ordering the
Government to submit regular updates regarding that topic (see Gov’t Ex. A
(compiling update letters and relevant court orders)), and by reviewing and
addressing defense motions regarding Maxwell’s conditions of confinement (see,
e.g., id. at 10-11).
Government to submit regular updates regarding that topic (see Gov’t Ex. A
(compiling update letters and relevant court orders)), and by reviewing and
addressing defense motions regarding Maxwell’s conditions of confinement (see,
e.g., id. at 10-11).
16. Maxwell appealed Judge Nathan’s latter two bail decisions. In
connection with that appeal, Maxwell also moved for pretrial release pending appeal.
After receiving briefing and hearing oral argument, this Court affirmed Judge
Nathan’s bail decisions and denied Maxwell’s motion for pretrial release on April
27, 2021. (Mot. Ex. A). Responding to claims about Maxwell’s sleeping
conditions that had been raised in her briefing and at oral argument, this Court’s
order noted that any request for “relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions”
at the MDC “should be addressed to the District Court.” (Id.).
connection with that appeal, Maxwell also moved for pretrial release pending appeal.
After receiving briefing and hearing oral argument, this Court affirmed Judge
Nathan’s bail decisions and denied Maxwell’s motion for pretrial release on April
27, 2021. (Mot. Ex. A). Responding to claims about Maxwell’s sleeping
conditions that had been raised in her briefing and at oral argument, this Court’s
order noted that any request for “relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions”
at the MDC “should be addressed to the District Court.” (Id.).
17. At no point after this Court’s bail decision did Maxwell file a
renewed motion for pretrial release in the District Court.
renewed motion for pretrial release in the District Court.
18. Following the issuance of this Court’s decision, on April 29,
2021, Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan asking the District Court “to
address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-
minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive
2021, Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan asking the District Court “to
address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-
minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive
9
DOJ-OGR-00020367
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document