You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal motion (unopposed motion for enlargement of time)
File Size: 34.9 KB
Summary

This document is an Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time filed on July 30, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 vs. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff's counsel, Stuart S. Mermelstein, requests an extension until August 12, 2009, to respond to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, citing obligations in other matters including related cases against Epstein. The document confirms that Epstein's counsel does not oppose this request.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe No. 8 Plaintiff
Plaintiff filing the motion for enlargement of time.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Defendant in the civil case.
Stuart S. Mermelstein Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff Jane Doe 8; filed the motion.
Adam D. Horowitz Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff Jane Doe 8.
Jack Alan Goldberger Attorney
Listed on Service List (likely Defense counsel).
Robert D. Critton Attorney
Listed on Service List (likely Defense counsel).

Timeline (4 events)

2009-07-14
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a Motion to Dismiss.
Southern District of Florida
2009-07-30
Date of filing for this Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time.
Southern District of Florida
2009-07-31
Original deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Motion to Dismiss.
Southern District of Florida
2009-08-12
Requested new deadline for Plaintiff to file response.
Southern District of Florida

Relationships (2)

Stuart S. Mermelstein Attorney/Client Jane Doe No. 8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe 8
Adam D. Horowitz Attorney/Client Jane Doe No. 8
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe 8

Key Quotes (2)

"Plaintiff requests an enlargement of time until August 12, 2009 to file her Memorandum in response to the Motion to Dismiss."
Source
009.pdf
Quote #1
"Defendant does not oppose the Motion."
Source
009.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,784 characters)

Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2009 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80802-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 8,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 8, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Unopposed Motion
for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and states as follows:
1. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a Motion to Dismiss in this action on July 14, 2009.
Pursuant to S.D.Fla.R. 7.1, Plaintiff has until July 31, 2009 to file her response to the Motion to
Dismiss.
2. Due to obligations of Plaintiff’s counsel in other cases and matters, including in
related cases against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff requests an enlargement of time until
August 12, 2009 to file her Memorandum in response to the Motion to Dismiss.
3. Plaintiff’s counsel has conferred with Defendant’s counsel regarding this request for
enlargement of time, and has been advised that Defendant does not oppose the Motion.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8 respectfully requests an enlargement of time until
August 12, 2009 to file her Memorandum in response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
- 1 -
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2009 Page 2 of 4
- 2 -
Dated: July 30, 2009. Respectfully submitted,
By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe 8
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160
Tel: 305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2009 Page 3 of 4
- 3 -
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on July 30, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the
Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day
to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices
of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who
are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2009 Page 4 of 4
- 4 -
SERVICE LIST
DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80802-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
jgoldberger@agwpa.com
Robert D. Critton, Esq.
rcritton@bclclaw.com
/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document