Jane Doe No. 8

Person
Mentions
24
Relationships
10
Events
18
Documents
12

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
10 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
6
6
View
person Adam D. Horowitz
Client
2
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Alleged abuser victim
2
2
View
person Stuart S. Mermelstein
Client
2
2
View
person Unidentified Girl #1
Recruiter target
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim abuser
1
1
View
person JANE DOE NO. 2
Co plaintiffs consolidated
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Adversarial
1
1
View
person Stuart Mermelstein
Client
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Settlement parties
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2010-06-25 N/A Filing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [DE 31] Southern District of Florida View
2010-06-24 N/A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered on FLSD Docket. Palm Beach County Courthous... View
2010-01-01 N/A Parties filed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Southern District of Florida View
2009-12-14 N/A New deadline to file Amended Complaint Southern District of Florida View
2009-12-14 N/A Requested deadline for filing Amended Complaint. N/A View
2009-12-03 N/A Plaintiff filed Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Complaint. United States District Cour... View
2009-12-03 N/A Court Order entered on docket granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time West Palm Beach, Florida View
2009-11-18 N/A Court entered Opinion and Order on Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss (DE 18), dismissing Coun... United States District Cour... View
2009-10-29 N/A Court Order Granting Extension of Time Southern District of Florida View
2009-08-12 N/A Requested new deadline for Plaintiff to file response. Southern District of Florida View
2009-08-11 N/A Filing of proposed order to consolidate cases for discovery Southern District of Florida View
2009-07-31 N/A Original deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Motion to Dismiss. Southern District of Florida View
2009-07-30 N/A Date of filing for this Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time. Southern District of Florida View
2009-05-01 N/A Plaintiff filed Complaint [DE 1] Southern District of Florida View
2003-01-01 N/A Jane Doe No. 8 turned 18 years old (age of majority), triggering the running of the statute of li... Florida View
2001-01-01 N/A Sexual Assault and Battery Epstein's Palm Beach mansion View
2001-01-01 N/A Alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 8 by Jeffrey Epstein. Palm Beach, Florida View
2001-01-01 N/A Alleged sexual encounter between Jane Doe No. 8 and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's Palm Beach mansion View

032.pdf

This is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 25, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe No. 8 against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of that settlement.

Legal order (final order of dismissal)
2025-12-26

031-01.pdf

This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON). Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the case between Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8 and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein dismissed following a settlement stipulation between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.

Court order (final order of dismissal)
2025-12-26

022.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on December 3, 2009, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8 in the Southern District of Florida, requesting an extension of time until December 14, 2009, to file an Amended Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein. The request cites obligations of the plaintiff's counsel, Stuart Mermelstein and Adam Horowitz, in other matters, including other Epstein cases. The defendant's counsel, identified in the service list as Jack Alan Goldberger and Robert D. Critton, did not object to the extension.

Legal motion (unopposed motion for enlargement of time)
2025-12-26

022-01.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CV-80802). The order grants the Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of December 14, 2009, to file an Amended Complaint.

Court order
2025-12-26

015.pdf

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on August 20, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims of 'Sexual Assault and Battery' (Count I) and 'Coercion and Enticement' (Count III) should be dismissed because they are barred by the statute of limitations. Epstein's lawyers contend that because the plaintiff was aware of the injury at the time of the alleged incident in 2001 (when she was 16) and turned 18 in 2003, the time limits for filing suit (4 years and 6 years respectively) had expired by the time the complaint was filed in 2009.

Legal pleading (reply memorandum)
2025-12-26

011.pdf

Legal motion filed on August 11, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the lead case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes. The document states that the case involves alleged sexual abuse in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2001. The motion was unopposed by the Defendant's counsel.

Legal motion (unopposed motion to consolidate for discovery purposes)
2025-12-26

011-01.pdf

This document is a proposed court order filed on August 11, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the existing case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes only.

Court order (proposed)
2025-12-26

009.pdf

This document is an Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time filed on July 30, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 vs. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff's counsel, Stuart S. Mermelstein, requests an extension until August 12, 2009, to respond to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, citing obligations in other matters including related cases against Epstein. The document confirms that Epstein's counsel does not oppose this request.

Legal motion (unopposed motion for enlargement of time)
2025-12-26

008.pdf

This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team on July 14, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims of Sexual Assault and Battery (Count I) and Coercion (Count III) are barred by the applicable 4-year (state) and 6-year (federal) statutes of limitations, as the alleged incident occurred in 2001 when the plaintiff was 16. Footnotes in the document provide graphic details of the allegations, describing how Jane Doe was recruited by another girl, brought to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, and sexually assaulted during a massage.

Legal pleading (defendant's motion to dismiss)
2025-12-26

006.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on July 7, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein's attorneys requested a one-week extension (until July 14, 2009) to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 8' on May 28, 2009, citing workload from other cases involving Epstein. The motion notes that opposing counsel agreed to this extension.

Legal motion (civil court filing)
2025-12-26

006-01.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated July 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of July 14, 2009, for the defendant to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.

Court order
2025-12-26

004.pdf

Legal document filed on June 5, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida court case 'Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The document is a Notice of Appearance indicating that attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike of the law firm Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP are entering the case to represent the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The service list includes contact information for other attorneys involved, including Jack Alan Goldberger (also for Epstein) and Adam D. Horowitz (for the Plaintiff).

Legal filing (notice of appearance)
2025-12-26
Total Received
$0.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2001-01-01 Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe No. 8 $0.00 Epstein left money for Jane after the massage/a... View
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1

Recruitment

From: Recruiter (Girl)
To: Jane Doe No. 8

Contacted by telephone regarding making money.

Call
2001-01-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity