An email chain from October 2007 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and redacted government officials (CC'ing Alex Acosta). The correspondence discusses legal strategy, specifically an agreement where liability would not be contested for specific victims ('girls on our list'), limiting discovery to damages rather than claim veracity. It also references Judge Davis's willingness to serve as a 'decider' and the execution of an addendum.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jay Lefkowitz | Attorney |
Sender/Recipient of emails; affiliated with Kirkland & Ellis LLP; discussing legal strategy, discovery, and Judge Davis.
|
| Alex Acosta | US Attorney (USAFLS) |
CC'd on emails regarding the Epstein case.
|
| Judge Davis | Judge/Arbiter |
Mentioned as a potential 'decider' in the legal proceedings.
|
| [Redacted] | Attorney/Official |
Correspondent with Jay Lefkowitz; likely representing the prosecution or government given the context of 'your office...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis LLP |
Law firm representing the defense (Jay Lefkowitz's firm), mentioned in email disclaimer.
|
|
| USAFLS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (associated with Alex Acosta).
|
|
| Fed Ex |
Requested method for sending original signature pages.
|
"The agreement says that they will not contest liability as to the girls on our list."Source
"Discovery may be relevant to the issue of the amount of damages suffered, but not the veracity of the claims."Source
"He indicated his willingness to serve as the 'decider.'"Source
"I am assuming that your office does not want to be copied on any subpoenas or anything related to discovery."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,563 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document